Talk:2020 West Coast Eagles season

• The body of an article should be readable without the lede. In the background, you should also define what the club is before going into what they did the prior season. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 10:53, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Done. Steelkamp (talk) 15:24, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• "disapointed", acording to whom? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 10:53, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Removed and reworded sentence. Steelkamp (talk) 15:24, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• " bowed out" not encyclopedic wording. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 10:53, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Removed and reworded sentence. Steelkamp (talk) 15:24, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Was there no playing changes? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 10:53, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • What do you mean by this? Steelkamp (talk) 15:24, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• 100,776 members - you might need to explain what members means in this context - is this the season ticket holders? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 10:53, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • This is hard to explain. There is a large range of types of memberships, from just deliveries of team merchandise to reserved seats at all 11 home matches. This was all thrown out of wack in 2020 as there were less matches, and less spectators allowed at each match, so members went to less matches than what their membership type would have allowed them to do. Steelkamp (talk) 15:24, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• This meant West Coast was the first non-Victorian AFL club to have the most memberships. - reword. "The membership was the highest in the AFL, the first time this happened to a club outside of Victoria." Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 10:53, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Done. Steelkamp (talk) 15:24, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• The season summary should be above the COVID-19 stuff. This explains about what the article is about, and then later you can talk about how the season was changed. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 10:53, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Done. Steelkamp (talk) 15:43, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• The covid-19 section suffers from a bit of WP:Proseline, could we merge some of the paragraphs a bit? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 10:53, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Done. Steelkamp (talk) 15:43, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Could we
  Bundle [38][39][40][41]? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 10:53, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]
  • Done. Steelkamp (talk) 16:31, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• I think explaining what you mean by "deletion" from the playing list (or just an explaination as to what a playing list is) would be beneficial. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 10:53, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've changed deletions from playing list to removals from playing list, as it made more sense. The playing list is simply the list of people that can play for the team that season. Steelkamp (talk) 16:31, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• The Eagle's round 1 match would be the last AFL match to be played for over two months.^{[citation needed]}. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 10:53, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Citation added. Steelkamp (talk) 16:58, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• but neither Richmond of Geelong lost their matches, causing West Coast to finish 5th at the end of the season, setting them up for an elimination final against Collingwood. - CN? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 10:53, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Citation added. Steelkamp (talk) 16:58, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• West Coast's elimination final against Collingwood occurred on October 3. The Eagles went into the match as favourites, after having beat the Magpies by 66 points earlier in the season, but Collingwood ended up winning the elimination final by 1 point, ending West Coast's 2020 season. This was the first year since 2016 where West Coast did not progress beyond the first week of the finals. - I feel this could do with a bit of an expansion, this isn't very long for the big knockout game at the end of the season Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 10:53, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Expanded upon final paragraph. Steelkamp (talk) 16:58, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (

   lists

   ):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (

   reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism

   ):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Review meta comments

• I'll begin the review as soon as I can! If you fancy returning the favour, I have
  WP:FAC, respectively. I'd be very grateful if you were to complete one of these if you get time. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 10:26, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]
  • Looks a lot better now, happy to pass. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 10:15, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]