Talk:2021 Salvadoran political crisis

2021 Salvadoran political crisis has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: July 6, 2021. (Reviewed version).

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2021 Salvadoran political crisis article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

El Salvador High‑importance

	El Salvador portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject El Salvador, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of El Salvador on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.El SalvadorWikipedia:WikiProject El SalvadorTemplate:WikiProject El SalvadorEl Salvador articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics Mid‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Central America

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Central America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Central America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Central AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Central AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Central AmericaCentral America articles

Latin America Mid‑importance

	Latin America portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Latin America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Latin AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Latin AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Latin AmericaLatin America articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was created or improved during WikiProject Latin America's "Latin American and the Caribbean 10,000 Challenge", which started on November 1, 2016, and is ongoing. You can help out!

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

GA Review

This review is
transcluded from Talk:2021 Salvadoran political crisis/GA1
. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: FredModulars (talk · contribs) 13:00, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm more than happy to review this! I will be adding comments in the next few days. FredModulars (talk) 13:00, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Criteria

Good Article Status

- Review Criteria

Further information:
WP:WIAGA

A good article is—

Well-written:

(a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct; and

(b) it complies with the

list incorporation.^[1]

Verifiable with no original research:

(a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with

the layout style guideline

;

(b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose);^[2]

(c) it contains no original research; and

(d) it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.

Broad in its coverage:

(a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic;^[3] and

(b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).

Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.

^[4]

Illustrated, if possible, by media such as
audio:

^[5]

(a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content; and

(b) media are

relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.^[6]

Review

Well-written:

Criteria	Notes	Result
(a) (prose)	Well done	Pass
(b) (MoS)	See comments on lead	Pass

Verifiable with no original research:

Criteria	Notes	Result
(a) (references)		Pass
(b) (citations to reliable sources)		Pass
(c) (original research)		Pass
(d) (copyvio and plagiarism)		Pass

Broad in its coverage:

Criteria	Notes	Result
(a) (major aspects)	Well done	Pass
(b) (focused)	Well done	Pass

Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.

Notes	Result
	Pass

Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.

Notes	Result
Nothing outstanding to warrant an "edit war"	Pass

Illustrated, if possible, by media such as
audio
:

Criteria	Notes	Result
(a) (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales)	See comments	Pass
(b) (appropriate use with suitable captions)	Would be nice to see more images in the article (such as non-free images here), but media seems adequate for now	Pass

Result

Result	Notes
Pass

Discussion

Comments (1 July)

Criteria 1

~~The lead is good, but it would be nice to add a brief mention of the background of the incident. It's a little confusing to have the incident described without any context.~~
- Added a brief mention at the end to tie in with the self-coup comments by the opposition.
~~Please add a link to Attorney General of El Salvador in the lead.~~
- Linked. Didn't even know that page existed.
~~Comma in Territorial Control Plan, should come after the quotes. Is there even a need for the quotes?~~
- Checked, and there shouldn't be quotes.
~~The link to the 2020 Salvadoran protests should be "protests against Bukele", not "protests". It makes it seem that
protests
is being linked.~~
- Fixed.

Critera 2–6

I'll just make it clear I can't read Spanish and I don't want to take a chance with an online translator (I've seen bad mistakes in the past). I'll have to assume all content citing Spanish sources have what they claim to say. All sources look reliable, but I will have to go through them in order to fact-check what is in the article. FredModulars (talk) 11:14, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article has significant coverage of the event, displays all points of view of the topic, and there is nothing substantial enough to say there's an edit dispute or war. Excellent job! I am not an expert on images, non-free images, and fair use, but from what I understand this article satisfies 6a.

The article seems to be in great shape. After the issues above are addressed, I will most likely be promoting the article. FredModulars (talk) 03:56, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All done! Thank you for reviewing this article. Apologies for the delay in my response as I was in El Salvador when this was nominated and wifi there for me is really only possible when I'm in San Salvador.
(Hablame) 17:12, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

No worries! I remember seeing your comment on the GAN for the 2020 political crisis and acknowledged I'd have to wait a while. It's all good though, I'll be promoting this article since all outstanding changes have been addressed. Congratulations and great job on your work! FredModulars (talk) 18:40, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

^ Compliance with other aspects of the Manual of Style, or the Manual of Style mainpage or subpages of the guides listed, is not required for good articles.
footnotes
can be used for in-line citations, but not both in the same article.

^ This requirement is significantly weaker than the "comprehensiveness" required of featured articles; it allows shorter articles, articles that do not cover every major fact or detail, and overviews of large topics.

^ Vandalism reversions, proposals to split or merge content, good faith improvements to the page (such as copy editing), and changes based on reviewers' suggestions do not apply. Nominations for articles that are unstable because of unconstructive editing should be placed on hold.

sound clips
, are also covered by this criterion.

^ The presence of images is not, in itself, a requirement. However, if images (or other media) with acceptable copyright status are appropriate and readily available, then some such images should be provided.

[1] Compliance with other aspects of the Manual of Style, or the Manual of Style mainpage or subpages of the guides listed, is not required for good articles.

[2] tnotes
can be used for in-line citations, but not both in the same article.

[3] This requirement is significantly weaker than the "comprehensiveness" required of featured articles; it allows shorter articles, articles that do not cover every major fact or detail, and overviews of large topics.

[4] Vandalism reversions, proposals to split or merge content, good faith improvements to the page (such as copy editing), and changes based on reviewers' suggestions do not apply. Nominations for articles that are unstable because of unconstructive editing should be placed on hold.

[5] sound clips
, are also covered by this criterion.

[6] The presence of images is not, in itself, a requirement. However, if images (or other media) with acceptable copyright status are appropriate and readily available, then some such images should be provided.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]