Talk:2022 EB5

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Astronomy: Astronomical objects / Solar System Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Astronomical objects, which collaborates on articles related to astronomical objects. This article is supported by Solar System task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Daily pageviews of this article A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Can someone add a picture or something? I can't because I'm not signed in. (use this link please: https://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/tools/sbdb_lookup.html#/?sstr=2022%20EB5&view=VOP, maybe show the asteroid impacting Earth or something) 72.203.63.234 (talk) 03:22, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think JPL's orbit viewer would be very useful for accurately illustrating EB5's impact trajectory since it does not take gravitational perturbations into account. I'll consider asking User:Tony873004 to add his animation here. Nrco0e (talk · contribs) 00:36, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Thank you! 72.203.63.234 (talk) 00:41, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for helping format the note! 72.203.63.234 (talk) 23:40, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Nrco0e (talk · contribs) 00:36, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that the orbits of 2022 EB5 and Pallas intersect at a low distance. Does this have to do anything with it, or am I just really dumb? 72.203.63.234 (talk) 16:27, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can you provide a source to that claim? Nrco0e (talk · contribs) 23:58, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No. After I looked into it, it turns out that what I was using was an incorrect source. Sorry! 72.203.63.234 (talk) 02:37, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you User:Phoenix7777 for adding an animation! 72.203.63.234 (talk) 00:24, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]