Talk:220th Military Police Brigade

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Good article nominee
Listed

GA Review

This review is
Talk:220th Military Police Brigade (United States)/GA1
. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Hi! I will be reviewing this article for GA, and should have the full review up within a few hours. Dana boomer (talk) 15:36, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

here
for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    • Individual years should not be wikilinked.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to
    reliable sources): c (OR
    ):
    • If available, the author name should go first in the reference in the last name, first name format.
    • Current refs 3 and 6 need publisher info.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the
    neutral point of view
    policy
    .
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have
    suitable captions
    )
    :
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Overall, a well-written article. I am putting the article on hold to allow time to address the few minor concerns detailed above. If you have questions, you can ask them here on the review page or on my talk page. Dana boomer (talk) 15:45, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed everything. How does it look now? -Ed!(talk)(Hall of Fame) 17:02, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Looks good, so I'm passing the article. For future work, I would suggest putting the author name first in the references, before the title, but this isn't something I'm going to hold the GA up over. Dana boomer (talk) 17:45, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on 220th Military Police Brigade. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:21, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]