Talk:Act of Uniformity 1558

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Law Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Christianity: Texts / Anglicanism Low‑importance Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Religious texts (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Anglicanism (assessed as Low-importance). England Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Ireland Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.

Obviously people aren't still being fined for not going to church in England. When did this and similar laws cease to be effective? Rhesusman 28 July 2005 20:38 (UTC)

Two thirds of this article consists of immense detail about the act being repealed, and in greater detail than it describes what the act said in the first place. A professional encyclopaedia would not do this, and neither should Wikipedia. Richard75 (talk) 22:16, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]