Talk:Activant

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Companies To-do: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes Maintain : Portal:Companies Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs Other : Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner Answer requests for comments

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers. This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist. [[Intuit#Intuit Eclipse|Eclipse]] The anchor (#Intuit Eclipse) has been deleted by other users before. Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Activant. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://distribution.activant.com
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100915085138/http://activant.co.uk/ to http://www.activant.co.uk

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:17, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

even link redirects to Epicor. Light2021 (talk) 21:09, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose merge on the grounds that the company has a notable history prior to the merge, its history best read separately. Klbrain (talk) 21:16, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The combined entity is continuing as Epicor. no need to separate article. Light2021 (talk) 22:18, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose for the name reason as before: there is a significant history prior to the merger. same reason we have articles for Manufacturers Hanover Corporation, many thousands of others.— Preceding unsigned comment added by UnitedStatesian (talk • contribs) 16:54, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Closing, given the uncontested objection and no support. Klbrain (talk) 08:41, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]