Talk:Adobe Flash Builder

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Adobe Flash Builder article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Software: Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Name

This Wikipedia entry is named "Adobe Flash Builder 4". However, as of July 29, 2009, the IDE is still named Adobe Flex Builder 3 (see http://www.adobe.com). I find confusing to display a name which hasn't still been publicly adopted. An encyclopedia is about the present, not about the future. 194.224.31.97 (talk) 08:51, 29 July 2009 (UTC)Ignacio Agulló[reply]

Price - FREE - for students and the unemployed

http://www.adobe.com/devnet/flex/free/index.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.58.99.57 (talk) 21:17, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On the Flash Builder 4.6 Standard/FAQ page (http://www.adobe.com/products/flash-builder-standard/faq.html) one can read an answer to the following question "Can education customers including students, faculty, and staff get Flash Builder for free?"

The answer is (I changed a few important words to italics)

"Flash Builder 4.6 Standard Edition is free for all eligible education customers. Students, faculty, and staff can get serial numbers to activate downloadable trial versions by registering on the registration site. During registration, you will be prompted to upload a copy of your student, faculty ID, or employee ID, or you can upload a letter on institutional letterhead proving your current affiliation with an educational institution. Once validated, you will be emailed a free educational serial number for Flash Builder 4.6 Standard. It may take up to two weeks after the request for you to receive the serial numbers."

However during registration on http://www.adobe.com/devnet-apps/flex/free/index.html, you are not prompted to upload anything (tested on opera and firefox with javascript on and off) and after providing Adobe your name and email address you simply get an "Adobe Flash Builder application denied" email. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.123.167.223 (talk) 20:03, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copy-edit tag

The copy-edit tag seems unnecessary here. Anybody disagree? I will remove it in a few days if not.--Anon423 (talk) 04:57, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I do. The article obviously have cohesion problem: We have isolated paragraph which have tried to mask their isolation by hiding under a heading of their own. I expect this issue cannot be resolved unless the article is expanded. However, I expect expansion alone cannot solve the problem either; the article should be methodically expanded. Nowadays, I try hard to be very economical about the tags I place and I think I have been economical about placing Copy-edit tag. Fleet Command (talk) 10:53, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Might I suggest the following restructure?

Introduction

Features

History <this would include name change>

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Adobe Flash Builder. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140821085522/http://www.leebrimelow.com/a-much-needed-name-change/ to http://www.leebrimelow.com/a-much-needed-name-change/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

Sourcecheck

}}).

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check

}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:38, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]