Talk:Aegialornis

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Aegialornis article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Birds Low‑importance

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Birds To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Wikify : Ninox boobook ocellata • The Institute for Bird Populations (more)
Other : Add photos to bird articles needing photos (search Flickr for free images

). Add taxonomic authorities to genus articles.

More outstanding tasks at the project's cleanup listing, Category:Birds articles needing attention, and Wikipedia:WikiProject Birds/Todo.

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

ISBN for Mlikovsky book

It is fortunate that the Mlikovsky book is available on-line. I looked in the actual PDF version and the ISBN is invalid there as well (

ISBN 80-901105-3-8 Parameter error in {{ISBN}}: checksum). This means that the check digit does not agree with the rest of number. You can confirm this fact by entering the number at isbn.org/converterpub.asp. I would have replaced it with an OCLC number (from worldcat.org) but the book is not found in Worldcat. In my view, it's better to just leave off the ISBN. The available data suggests that the number was invalid-as-published, so there is no point in a further search on the web or in libraries for a valid ISBN. EdJohnston 18:07, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Image

Nothing on Flickr. Richard001 (talk) 07:12, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]