Talk:Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

United States: Government Stub‑class Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Low-importance). Medicine Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Science Policy Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Policy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science policy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science PolicyWikipedia:WikiProject Science PolicyTemplate:WikiProject Science PolicyScience Policy articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article in not written in an encyclopedic way, referring inappropriately to current events. Any controversies should be moved to a section “Controversies” (say) and written in a historical context e.g. “In 2018 ...” etc., not in the context of the current administration. Remember that the article is not only for the consumption of contemporaneous US audiences, but all English-speaking readers. Abelian (talk) 23:13, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure that I agree with stubifying. Some of the information was boardspeak and references were lacking, but overall I think it could have been tweaked and improved upon rather than wiping it out. The overview helps to see the bird's-eye view of the organization. II | (t - c) 19:16, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It was bold! Yes I just thought that with all the links to the primary sources it served really as an advert rather than an encyclopedic entry. We did lose some ideas as readers for what they do, but then again, it was written is such a way that one wonders if there are any reliabe sources independent of the subject that would verify what was said.

U}}) while signing a reply, thx 19:47, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Feel free to revert if one thinks it is better the other way.

U}}) while signing a reply, thx 19:48, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

I have just modified one external link on Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140723144330/http://www.hhs.gov/budget/fy2015/fy-2015-budget-in-brief.pdf to http://www.hhs.gov/budget/fy2015/fy-2015-budget-in-brief.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:20, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]