Talk:Agni Yoga

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination: no consensus, 6 July 2015, see discussion. keep, 23 August 2009 (UTC), see discussion.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Yoga Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Yoga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Yoga, Hatha yoga, Yoga as exercise and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YogaWikipedia:WikiProject YogaTemplate:WikiProject YogaYoga articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Alternative Views Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative views, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of significant alternative views in every field, from the sciences to the humanities. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion.Alternative ViewsWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative ViewsTemplate:WikiProject Alternative ViewsAlternative Views articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Living Ethics was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 25 December 2015 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Agni Yoga. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

Recently I've noticed that Agni Yoga page was replaced by Living Ethics page; I don't understand why.

I read both articles and while they discuss the same teaching, they have quite different perspectives. My view is that both perspectives are valid, can coexist, can help those interested in Agni Yoga get overview about its characteristics and current activities associated with it.

Tabibito8 (talk) 08:06, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• It is translated with the help «http://translate.google.ru»

The article Agni Yoga was written with violations, indeed:

• No original research
• Reliable sources

This article was the personal opinion of Agni Yoga Society.

The article

The International Center of the Roerichs holds annual international scientific conference. Scientists from all over the world participate in these conferences.

Unfortunately, Agni Yoga Society is not involved in international scientific conferences, is located in the side of science.

I suggest to leave the article

It might well be that Agni Yoga page violates some of Wikipedia policies. My understanding is that outright removal of this page also violates Wikipedia Deletion policy [1]. Old Agni Yoga page certainly does not meet criteria for outright removal.

Instead, I suggest that it is best to leave both pages and improve both with objective of eventually using it as different sections of Agni Yoga Wikipedia entry.

Tabibito8 (talk) 13:41, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See the

Content forking. --Deodarvostok (talk) 06:25, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Sure I read

Content forking

. Correct me if wrong, you are saying that one of the reasons for redirection is that both articles talk about the same subject?

True, it is the same subject and but perspective and content is different. That is why I suggested discussion and eventual merging under Agni Yoga title. Redirecting without discussion is POV fork.

-- Tabibito8 (talk) 07:27, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, on it. Also because there is no difference between Agni Yoga ‎‎ and Living Ethics.

Also article Agni Yoga has not been removed. It broke rules of Wikipedia, therefore has been copied to use of authoritative sources. Therefore rule Wikipedia:Deletion policy here does not approach. --Deodarvostok (talk) 07:46, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If memory serves, I am the one who first created this article several years ago. Someone from the American society later made extensive edits, and especially expanded the theological description. To the best of my knowledge, this new material seems to be factual, though one might question its length.

"Agni Yoga" and "Living Ethics" are the same thing, and ought to be the same article. I cannot agree that either is especially scientific, though followers may be interested in scientific subjects. At bottom, it is a spiritual teaching rooted in Blavatskean Theosophy, which recognizes material from the Roerichs as a new source of revelations from the Masters.

I would say that the theological sections ought to be compressed, while more information is needed giving concrete information about the history and scope of Agni Yoga activities around the world. An especially pressing lacuna is the lack of information about AY groups in Russia and Eastern Europe. (I am aware of a new monograph on this from the Gregorian Pontifical University Press, and am waiting for my library to receive it.)

In general, sources are a big problem. We have a lot of citations of AY texts, but only a few of secondary works (which I realize are scarce for this subject). I wish that an AY person who knows Russian could be persuaded to add sources in that language.Dawud (talk) 03:32, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There's an excessive use of inappropriate primary source material in this article. I removed the entire teachings sections here as it's not in the right tone (it's too promotional) and it seems to go on without any context. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 00:42, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

+1 - David Gerard (talk) 11:09, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As someone who suggested that