Talk:Albert Kalonji

A fact from Albert Kalonji appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 28 May 2007. The text of the entry was as follows: Did you know... that while leader of the short-lived secessionist state of South Kasai, Albert Kalonji gave himself the title of Supreme Chief of the Muluba People and Protector of the Associated Tribes? A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2007/May.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Africa: DRC Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Democratic Republic of the Congo. Biography: Politics and Government / Royalty and Nobility This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Mid-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility (assessed as Low-importance). inactive .Cold WarWikipedia:WikiProject Cold WarTemplate:WikiProject Cold WarCold War articles

Kalonji or Kalongi? Either may well be acceptable but if so it should be explained by a footnote. [email protected] 64.231.53.174 01:03, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Every source I've seen gives "Kalonji" as the spelling. Josh 05:53, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is the German Wikipedia truly a reliable source? [email protected] 64.231.53.174 01:05, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It be simpler to use the sources that the German version of the article uses, even the editors contributing to the German article are capable of adding original research. UniversalBread (talk) 09:34, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060517050400/http://www.countrywatch.com/mi_topic.asp?vCOUNTRY=40&SECTION=COVER&TOPIC=POHIS&TYPE=TEXT to http://www.countrywatch.com/mi_topic.asp?vCOUNTRY=40&SECTION=COVER&TOPIC=POHIS&TYPE=TEXT

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—

[1] -Indy beetle (talk) 03:21, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]