All That was one of the Social sciences and society good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles
The contents of the All That Live! page were merged into All That on 8 March 2019. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page.
Copyright
Lyrics to copyrighted songs are copyright violations. --FuriousFreddy 22:53, 2 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
FAC: October 28, 2006
I have renominated the article for FAC and archived the previous nomination. It looks like it has been cleaned up quite a bit and looks ready for FAC status. PF4Eva 23:20, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Noncompliant
What would have to be done to the article to make it compliant without stripping it down to the bone or screwing it up royally? I think to help maintain the NPOV, any reference of the "
Golden Age" of the show should be converted into references to the first generation of the show. However, you can still call them the old All That and the new All That. Does that sound good, or not? 68.97.47.88 21:34, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply
]
I changed the heading from "Golden Age of All That" to "First Generation of All That" to reflect NPOV. Let me know if my edit was unnecessary. Thanks! 68.97.47.88 22:21, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
TMC1982
As I mentioned on your talk page a while back, it is preferable to make one large edit than 20 minors in a row. CaptHayfever 16:39, 3 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I'll edit in a fashion that I'll find the most suitable (shouldn't you have bigger things to worry about). You should be glad that I care about perfection! User:TMC1982
It's a courtesy to your fellow editors to keep the revision history easy to follow. (And on a side note, people can figure out that the "Cast members" section of an article about All That means "All That cast members") CaptHayfever 03:38, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
POV Tag
To whomever added the POV tag, will you please explain you're reasoning behind this? Many of the opinions about All That can be easily found in the external links section down below. User:TMC1982
Until I get a proper explaination behind why the POV tag is there, I'm going to remove it.User:TMC1982
You're kidding, right? This article is a fanboy feeding frenzy. The explanations of the seasons after the "Golden Age" (A POV statement in itself) ended are just insult after insult. I'll admit that they were very, very bad, but the article offers almost no solid information about it other than your opinions. Just because you put "Most fans believe" or "Some think" before a statement, that doesn't mean it's automatically free from any criticism. I'm readding the tag.--Agent Aquamarine 05:22, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Jump The Shark Page
Will you please stop removing the link to the All That page on http://www.jumptheshark.com! I want as many opinions on All That included as I can possibly find.User:TMC1982
is it running or not?
I'm the anon that added a cite needed tag to "All That is an" because I simply couldn't determine if it is running or not running. I just randomly came to this page, never having heard
of All That, and saw a contradiction with the "is" and the tense used later in the sentence, together with the cancellation section below. My guess would be that it is not running now, but maybe reruns are showing somewhere? Anyway I've since added two references, one to the imdb entry, another to the soundtrack listing. I've also commented out two inline links after the urban legend paragraph. I followed both links but they yield nothing resembling to citation. -213.219.161.27 00:40, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Confusing Sentence
I changed "Schneider was supposedly absent from the 100th episode special while and Kopelow was supposedly absent from the 10th anniversery special." to "Schneider was supposedly absent from the 100th episode special, and Kopelow was supposedly absent from the 10th anniversery special." I think that makes more sense, but not sure it's what the original intentions were. Correct me if I'm wrong. Kushboy 05:58, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Template?
I have added other Nickelodeon spin-off shows to the "See also" section. Do you think this might be the time for a template? Please reply. - LBM 21:14, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Cast
Should the cast members be ordered by debut year as well as alphabetical?
I would say keep it alphabetical on this page. For people who want to see a chronological order, List of All That characters is indexed that way, as well as the Wikiquote page. CaptHayfever 17:29, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You got me; I've never even heard of it. Sounds more like something from a sketch than an actual oath. CaptHayfever 00:07, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
UPDATE - Actually, I checked the reference link on the oath article, and that's just some fansite club thing; it has no connection to the show whatsoever. Drop it like an anvil. CaptHayfever 03:48, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Original Research
I just did a major update to get rid of all of the unverifiable claims, and kept the ones that can be varified. It might help to cite sources, but I'll do that later unless someone else does it.
Very awesome, man. I've been wanting to clean this thing up for a while, but could never find enough time. Great work. CaptHayfever 04:17, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I just did another update, but I'm not quite finished yet. I left off on citing sources for the section on Kevin returning had the show come back for an 11th season. But it's looking good so far.68.97.47.88 23:34, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'm still updating, but I am having trouble getting rid of all the A's and B's, etc., in the References section and it's driving me up the wall! Can somebody please help? I am changing the refnames to death and not even that works! Thanks for any help you can give me.68.97.47.88 21:16, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
That's the best I could do to clean this article up a bit. Stil don't know why I have A's and B's in the references; I have all the references unique names, even though it was pretty tough to think of names that weren't already occupied. But I think overall I did a pretty good job. I fixed the NPOV, the facts, and fixed the footnotes (to the best of my ability). I hope that helps. 68.97.47.88 22:29, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You should've at least let someone else take a look at the article before you removed the POV tag. It's slightly better, but still bad. I mean, most of the references are posts from fan forums. Rereadding the tag.--Agent Aquamarine 02:07, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry about that. Anyway, I've removed some claims that were only backed up by IMDb and fan sites and stuff that couldn't be verified. I saved them to my computer just in case any of it is ever verified by a reliable source (you never know). 68.97.47.88 00:27, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Looks great now. It just needs a bit of cleanup, which I'll probably take care of when I get home today, and we should be able to remove the tag.
--Agent Aquamarine 12:51, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The tag is still up, so in addition to removing the section on the return of Good Burger, I also added a source for the claim that Action League Now originated on All That, which it did. I also decided to remove the claim that Ned's Declassified School Survival Guide used Channel 6 and a Half in its episodes, since I've never seen it mentioned on the show, although I don't watch it very often. It's deleted until somebody confirms it. 68.97.47.88 21:47, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I wasn't sure where to put this, but I assume this place is as good as any. I have had a book out for a few months now available on booklocker.com, All That About All That. Together with Alisa Reyes, I have interviewed numerous members of the cast and crew and put it out in a fairly short booklet. Anyway, would it be right to include a section on the page mentioning this? Just wanted to get some other opinions, but it seemed appropriate. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Clavinbot (talk • contribs) 23:53, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Off the Air Period
I think All That already is off the air period because no episodes have aired (including reruns) since about May or June. I know there have been Nicktoons (Jimmy Timmy Power Hour 3) and movies (What a Girl Wants) in its place.
Return of Good Burger
I deleted the section on the return of Good Burger until further notice. That will help make the article a little bit shorter, and I wasn't sure how notable it was. I mean, if the recent discovery of the complete unused footage from John Carpenter's Halloween isn't notable enough to be included in the Halloween (1978 film) article, then Good Burger's return probably isn't notable enough for this article. 68.97.47.88 21:32, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Good Burger is arguably the most recognizable and/or popular sketch in All That history (they did after all, turn it into a full-length movie). The fact that they tried to revive the with somebody else in the lead role instead of Kel Mitchell (as the same character mind you), should be noticable. TMC1982 2006 4 September (UTC)
Okay, wasn't exactly sure. I didn't want to change anything without saying anything on here about it. By the way, I had a great edit planned for this aticle yesterday to settle the accuracy disputes and NPOV disputes, but it looks like editing is restricted now. I'm sorry if my editing this article has caused any trouble, but I was trying to prevent this kind of thing (or worse, deletion) from happening. Good luck getting everything fixed. 68.97.47.88 23:19, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
And so, beaten, torn, and with many paper cuts...
I have reduced the references, removing the trivial ones that I could find and grouping redunant ones. And whose idea was it to give the refs nasty names like "They just hired Spears because she was Britney's sister and she destroyed the show"? GAHHHHHHHH!!!! ~
Don't worry, I have nominated this article for peer review to see what can be improved. And I also changed that the first episode of the "New" All That prenmiered in 2002, and changed it to 2001; that was my mistake. Season 7 was in 2001, and Jamie Lynn Spears joined the next season, which was in 2002. I'm sorry for the error. PF4Eva
The seventh season of All That premiered in January 2002. So technically, it premiered in the mid-way point of the 2001-2002 television season. So I guess that's why there's the confusion. TMC1982 2 October 2006 (UTC)
September 23, 2006 revision
I have revised the article quite a bit today, and I think it looks better than it did, but still needs some improvements, especially sourcing. I think I took care of NPOV issues pretty well. Let me know what you think here or by replying to the
All That peer review page. (Edit: I'm sorry, I forgot to sign my name.) PF4Eva 20:38, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply
]
Most recent edit(s)
I have just completed another round of tough editing. There are just too many claims that can't be verified and too many POV issues. I might need help in cleaning this article up a bit.
Reference?
How do we know Ashton Kutcher had any relation to All That? I can't find the information anywhere else on the internet.
I have seen nearly every episode (and I have seen every single episode from 1994-2000, and Ashton Kutcher was never a castmember. I don't know where this information came from. It needs to be removed from this article until actually confirmed by a reliable source. PF4Eva 00:00, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Major revision: October 31, 2006
In my attempt to clean up this article, I have deleted as many unsourced statements as I could find, and even deleted a few sections/statements as per WP:NOR. I will next incorporate the trvia and lists into the article; adequately source statements; get rid of forum/fan sources unless reliable (example: the Lisa Foiles Yahoo! page announcing the cancellation); and formatting the article as per WikiProject Television. I'm trying to get this up to GA status, and then if I play my cards right, FA status. It's about time this article gets what it deserves. PF4Eva 00:11, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not finished yet with my revision. I just have to fix some of the sources to make them more adequate, and then format it as per Wikipedia: WikiProject Television. It's coming out great so far, in my opinion. PF4Eva 01:06, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Just did what may be my last edit. I think I've cleaned the page up enough to nominate it for Good Article. Then if that works, I'll try renominating it for FA. I think I finally hit the jackpot this time. PF4Eva 23:38, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
DVD releases?
Is there any info on the DVD releases on All that? "THROUGH FIRE, JUSTICE IS SERVED!" 22:38, 7 November 2006 (UTC)