Talk:Alta Wind Energy Center

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Energy Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Environment: Sustainability Mid‑importance Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Sustainability task force.

Alta Wind Energy Center is the umbrella project for what is expected to be several wind farms. The first of which is the Alta xxxx Creek Mojave wind farm. Construction has started on phase I of this farm. This will consist of 100 1.5 MW GE wind turbines. (150 MW total). Eventually (according to the web site) this farm could have up to 320 turbines and 800 MW. (Although by my calculation, it won't likely have more than 700 MW of capability, which would be the capacity if they used 2.5MW turbines for the remaining 220).

In other words, the project won't even surpass the existing Roscoe wind farm in Texas (781 MW). --71.214.218.49 (talk) 02:17, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

All we can do is report what the reliable third-party sources say. Johnfos (talk) 09:21, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An image used in this article, File:Tehachapi Wind Turbines 7-8-10.JPG, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status What should I do? Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is fair use rationale If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review This notification is provided by a Bot -- talk) 17:30, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply ]

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

• http://www.power-technology.com/projects/alta-wind-energy-center-awec-california/

  Triggered by \bpower-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—

• Attempted to fix sourcing for http://altawindenergycenter.com/faqs.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—

I have just modified one external link on Alta Wind Energy Center. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.cnbc.com/id/100343363/MidAmerican_Wind_Announces_Completion_of_300Megawatt_Pinyon_Pines_Wind_I_and_II_Projects
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140222121700/http://www.cpuc.ca.gov/NR/rdonlyres/86F3CDEA-32F1-4343-97EA-777965714123/0/RPS_Project_Status_Table_2013_July.xls to http://www.cpuc.ca.gov/NR/rdonlyres/86F3CDEA-32F1-4343-97EA-777965714123/0/RPS_Project_Status_Table_2013_July.xls

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:00, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Alta Wind Energy Center. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101007120929/http://www.awea.org/projects/projects.aspx to http://www.awea.org/projects/Projects.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:06, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think the site area of 3200 acres is correct. The article says:

The original "Alta-Oak Creek Mojave Project" plan consisted of up to 320 wind turbines occupying a 9,000-acre (36 km2) area while producing 800 MW (1,100,000 hp) of power.

If 3200 acres is correct, they are producing twice the power for a third of the planned area. Rather, i believe 3200 acres is the area of the Tehachapi Pass wind farm. The site area of Alta should be 130 km2, as per the Tehachapi Pass wind farm article:

The 2006 contract, which more than doubles SCE’s wind energy portfolio, envisions more than 50 square miles (130 km2) of wind parks in the Tehachapi region, which is triple the size of any existing U.S. wind farm.

The corrections put wind power density (net output per m2) in the right ballpark of 2-3 W/m2.