Talk:Amalgamation of Toronto

	This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Canada: Ontario / Toronto Mid‑importance Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Ontario. This article is supported by WikiProject Toronto (assessed as High-importance).

The animated map looks very good. Scarborough got shafted, but that's okay, it's only a map...lol Blackjays1 (talk) 11:55, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If Chicago amalgamated with Cook and Dupage Counties, Chicago's population would jump to 7 million residents. If Atlanta amalgamated with the closer-in suburbs, it's population would jump from 500,000 to 3.7 million, making it the third largest city in the USA. If Phoenix and Maricopa County merged, Phoenix's population would surge close to LA's at 3.8 million. If Houston affixed its suburbs, its population would rocket at 5 million.

My question is, if Toronto amalgamated with its suburbs, how can it have a Metro population. Before the 1998 amalgamation, Toronto's inner city population was about 700,000 with a metro area of about 2.5 million. After the amalgamation, toronto's population went to 2.5 million with a metro population of 5 million. Where did those other 2.5 million people come from? Is the entire province of Ontario included in Toronto's metra area? Do they include Buffalo? --MarioSmario (talk) 16:59, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Immigration and natural population growth. The

Canada 2011 Census

in two days, so these figures will be updated soon.

Why do you find it surprising that the Toronto area has grown so much? BTW: the answers to the questions you asked are already contained in the appropriate articles about Toronto, the Greater Toronto Area, the Golden Horseshoe, and Ontario. Mindmatrix 20:01, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The preceding response is utter nonsense, marked by an odd form of canadian exceptionalism that has emerged lately. --MarioSmario (talk) 23:28, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I see. You weren't looking for an answer, just a reason to berate the responder. For your edification, Metropolitan Toronto was not the "metro area" per se, and certainly not equivalent to the metropolitan areas used for statistical purposes in the USA. It was a level of government representing six constituent municipalities (previously suburbs in the late 1800s and early 1900s). Old Toronto was just 97.15 square kilometres (37.51 sq mi), and it amalgamated with the five boroughs:

• East York (21.26 square kilometres (8.21 sq mi))
• Etobicoke (123.93 square kilometres (47.85 sq mi))
• North York (176.87 square kilometres (68.29 sq mi))
• Scarborough (187.70 square kilometres (72.47 sq mi))
• York (23.18 square kilometres (8.95 sq mi))

So, the current city has an area of 630 square kilometres (240 sq mi). By comparison, Phoenix has an area of 517.948 square miles (1,341.48 km²) and Houston an area of 601.3 square miles (1,557 km²). The metropolitan area of Toronto is not truly comparable to those of Phoenix or Houston, as the MSA and CSA used in the US are not equivalent to the CMA used in Canada. The Toronto CMA has a population of 5,583,064 and an area of 5,905.71 square kilometres (2,280.21 sq mi); the Houston MSA has a population of 5,946,800 and an area of 10,062 square miles (26,060 km²); Phoenix seems to have one urban core (hence no CSA), and its MSA has a population of 4,192,887 (I can't seem to find its area). These numbers better reflect the level of urbanisation of each of those cities. Mindmatrix 06:36, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Amalgamation of Toronto. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070929044646/http://www.torontofamilyhistory.org/chronology.html to http://www.torontofamilyhistory.org/chronology.html
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/DBLaws/RepealedStatutes/English/90m62_e.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:49, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]