Talk:American Chiropractic Association

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Chiropractic Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chiropractic, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Chiropractic on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChiropracticWikipedia:WikiProject ChiropracticTemplate:WikiProject ChiropracticChiropractic articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Virginia Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Virginia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Virginia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirginiaWikipedia:WikiProject VirginiaTemplate:WikiProject VirginiaVirginia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

I have limited content to stuff that is uniquely about the ACA. Other articles cover other aspects about the profession. As the main contributor has a clear

2600:1700:7A51:10B0:7D11:60ED:AD62:6369 (talk) 23:31, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A user has edited the description of the ACA to include the term 'pseudoscientific'. As there is no definitive or objective definition of the term "pseudoscience", it is commonly used as a pejorative term, and the citation provided (to a 2008 blog post) is not to a peer-reviewed publication.

As the use of perjorative language is inconsistent with Wikipedia's NPOV policy, it seems as if it should be removed. How do others feel about this?

Note: this is not intended to start a discussion of the merits or lack thereof of chiropractors; this is simply a question regarding neutrality. Radmap (talk) 18:50, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. The term as well as the referenced blog post are clearly not neutral. I am in support of both being removed. Inn8user123 (talk) 18:53, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]