Talk:Andy Scott (politician)

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group.

Canada: New Brunswick / Politics Low‑importance

	the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject New Brunswick.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Political parties and politicians in Canada.

Untitled

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Move. If the guitarist doesn't even have his own article, he certainly can't be the most common target of a search for "Andy Scott". Also, I'll merge the histories properly so that's not a good argument to oppose a move. If a guitarist article is made, another move can be proposed. —Wknight94 (talk) 15:57, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

Andy Scott (Canadian politician) → Andy Scott — The only other Andy Scott listed on the dab page is simply a redirect to another article. The article was cut-and-paste moved in June. Kirjtc2 19:47, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

Survey

Add * '''Support''' or * '''Oppose''' on a new line followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.

Oppose 1) I think there should be a dab page. The guitarist probably deserves having his own page demerged from Sweet. 2) The proposed move would wipe out the history that actually belongs here. (To correct the history, this page should be copied back to its original home - and I propose then moved here !) -- Beardo 23:02, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

Add any additional comments:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.