Talk:Anglo-Saxon charters

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Untitled

I've altered the comments about Simon Keynes, who in fact is not General Editor, but rather only the secretary. The General Editor (and chairman of the committee) is Professor Nicholas Brooks.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on

nobots
|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—

Talk to my owner:Online 19:53, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Anglo-Saxon charters. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

Sourcecheck
}}).

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:43, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of parenthetic comment

I am about to remove this parenthetic comment - "(though it must also be admitted that the emergence of wills and chirographs also owed much to later development)". I can't work out what it is intended to convey. Perhaps someone who does understand it could re-write it. Rjm at sleepers (talk) 06:43, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that it does not make sense. Dudley Miles (talk) 09:26, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]