Talk:Animal Outlook

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Animal rights Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animal rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of animal rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Animal rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Animal rightsTemplate:WikiProject Animal rightsAnimal rights articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article presents no criticisms of this organization and uses a completely inappropriate tone, particularly the paragraph about the egg labeling legal fight. Natalie 22:46, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds like Soap Boxing to me

I agree. Definitely changed a lot since I started it... Archer7 18:27, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In that case, I think you picked the wrong tag, since the tag clearly states "This is primarily a statement about the article's subject, not necessarily its quality or veracity" (emphasis mine). Natalie 00:11, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An admittedly non-exhaustive search has not netted me a lot of non-COK sources, and so far all of those hits but one (a blog, and thus not

reliable) have been positive. A big problem here is the fact that COK owns at least a half-dozen domain names. Natalie 00:18, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Kickass. I'm still not having any luck finding independent sources. If you have access to Lexis Nexus or similar, that might help. Natalie 18:40, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. So, in the interest of impartiality, I have removed or altered all of the content that contains adjective bias. Also, I have removed those links that are unmistakably promotional. What does everyone think of the change?Ares0524 15:34, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Looks a lot better stubbed. It's too bad there aren't many online sources to use... Oh well. Natalie 19:09, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Weird that no one could find the Washington Post articles about the group, which came out in 2003 and 2005 (before all these 2007 comments). Also, to take out the egg labeling campaign completely (without just trying to make it neutral if it was not already so) is also a form of non-neutrality in that it amounts to removing facts which are quite relevant to this encyclopedia article. The egg labeling is probably one of their most noteworthy events. I've added information about their recent campaigns.--Gloriamarie (talk) 20:55, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The legal advocacy section added after this conversation happened (i.e. in 2016) uses an inappropriate tone in the first paragraph. The section also contains a statement that does not appear to be backed up by the source stating "[illegally obtained profits] could impact the price of milk for years" while the source states "will likely continue to affect the price of milk for years to come". Wallby (talk) 16:03, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.cok.net/feat/article-wp.php
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160402091527/http://eatocracy.cnn.com/2014/06/25/undercover-animal-abuse-videos/ to http://eatocracy.cnn.com/2014/06/25/undercover-animal-abuse-videos/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:52, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on

• Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6DIAXlvM8?url=http://www.cok.net/feat/article-wp.php to http://www.cok.net/feat/article-wp.php
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140515085217/http://usvegweek.com/ to http://www.usvegweek.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:15, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]