Talk:Annual general meeting

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Business High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Companies High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Companies To-do: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes Maintain : Portal:Companies Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs Other : Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner Answer requests for comments Law Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. inactive .Parliamentary ProcedureWikipedia:WikiProject Parliamentary ProcedureTemplate:WikiProject Parliamentary ProcedureParliamentary Procedure articles

An annual meeting of a corporation is not "commonly" referred to as an Annual General Meeting or abbreviated as "AGM" in the United States. This article should be more specific as to where this terminology is in common use. --Russ Blau (talk) 23:39, 7 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The introduction has : "An AGM is held every year to elect the Board of Directors". But an AGM is not necessarily held every year, and organisations holding AGMs do not necessarily hane a "Board of Directors".

Any part of the Introduction which is not known to be applicable world-wide should be moved into another Section, qualified, or corrected. 82.163.24.100 (talk) 12:54, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Annual general meeting. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080529010842/http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file42262.pdf to http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file42262.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:31, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I think that the pictufe added yesterday is blurry mobile picture and has a strange light that makes it of poor quality. It is a famous person sitting there, but else it is a table on a scen. You do not see why it should look like a general meeting, it could be a play at a theatre. Because of the poor quality and that it does not add something to tje article I think it should be removed, and I ask another neutral person to look at it too to get a second opinion. Adville (talk) 11:11, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]