Talk:Anote Tong

Anote Tong was nominated as a Social sciences and society good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (September 30, 2019). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard. If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

New Zealand Low‑importance Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Biography: Politics and Government This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance). Micronesia: Kiribati Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Micronesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Micronesia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MicronesiaWikipedia:WikiProject MicronesiaTemplate:WikiProject MicronesiaMicronesia articles Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Kiribati (assessed as Top-importance).

The major edit was done to maintain the privacy and security of Anote Tong as well as maintain the writing style of Wikipedia. As a Statesman, personal information about President Tong's children and grandchildren is not appropriate.

I see that the intro has Chinese translations of the president's name.

This is over reach to a quite absurd degree. Should we also have every other language variant in the intro? Will move to Name in other languages if it can be confirmed as a proper translation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Avaiki (talk • contribs) 01:59, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on

|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20150212001741/http://pidp.eastwestcenter.org/pireport/2011/November/11-28-04.htm to http://pidp.eastwestcenter.org/pireport/2011/November/11-28-04.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080605183737/http://www.iht.com:80/articles/ap/2008/06/05/asia/AS-GEN-New-Zealand-World-Environment-Day.php to http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2008/06/05/asia/AS-GEN-New-Zealand-World-Environment-Day.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018.

}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —

]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on

nobots

|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120303063232/http://www.radioaustralianews.net.au/stories/201201/3408064.htm?desktop to http://www.radioaustralianews.net.au/stories/201201/3408064.htm?desktop
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070831001951/http://www.iht.com:80/articles/ap/2007/08/23/asia/AS-POL-Kiribati-Election.php to http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2007/08/23/asia/AS-POL-Kiribati-Election.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018.

}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—

]

GA nomination

• Comment: While I recognize the article is short, there's no much more information about Mr. Tong. Hope this is clarified. Kind regards -- --LLcentury (talk) 17:42, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

GA toolbox
Copyvio detector Authorship External links
Reviewing
Templates Criteria Instructions

This review is

transcluded from Talk:Anote Tong/GA1

. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Vanamonde93 (talk · contribs) 21:40, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take this one. Vanamonde (Talk) 21:40, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Checklist

for criteria

1. Is it well written?

   A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:

   See comments below

   B. It complies with the

   list incorporation

   :

   See comments below

2. Is it verifiable with no original research?

   A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with

   the layout style guideline

   :

   Formatting looks okay

   B. All

   reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines

   :

   No especially unreliable sources

   C. It contains no original research:

   Conclusions drawn from these sources are definitely unwarranted

   D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:

   B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):

   See comments below

4. Is it
   neutral
   ?

   It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:

   Most serious problem; written like a resumé in places.

5. Is it stable?

   It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing

   edit war

   or content dispute:

6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?

   A. Images are

   copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content

   :

   B. Images are

   suitable captions

   :

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   Failing per comments below. Not performing copyright checks because result is clear. Vanamonde (Talk) 02:09, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

At the moment, this has quite severe issues with

. It's written a lot like a CV, and there's a lot of repetition of positive information. The article really harps on his climate change activism. It's certainly important enough to cover, but not in the manner done here. I'll go into the specifics below, but given the extent of work required, and the retirement of the nominator, I don't think there's any purpose served by prolonging the review.

• A quote from a musician isn't a testament to his effectiveness, and is
  undue weight
  in the lead.
• "High Court of Tarawa had confirmed that there was no fraud" This is also an inappropriate use of Wikipedia's voice. The High Court is not a reliable source; the only thing that would justify us saying that in Wikipedia's voice is if reliable sources say the same thing.
• "Early Life" jumps back and forth; what island he is from should be in the same part of the article as material about his family.
• Repetition and non-chronology again in the first part of "political career"
• "Tong also stood front and center this is puffery
• The first paragraph of "Issues" is quite off-topic; based on information in the article at the moment, all Tong has done is to say stuff.
• Material about the marine park is repeated thrice. It's also factually incorrect, or at least needs clarification; [1] suggests there are larger ones around.
• Despite the existence of a section titled "Anote Tong Foundation", there is no information about such a foundation in the article.
• The rest of that section is decidedly
  undue
  ; a foundation he is a part of requires a few words of description at most, unless it's about work he has done.
• Generally, a lot of the article is a list of his quotes.
• If the repetitious and undue material is pruned, there's very little left.

If anyone watching this is interested in fixing these issues and renominating this page, they should feel free to ping me for a quick review; that way the article does not have to stay in the queue for another lengthy period of time. I am also happy to advise anyone who tries to fix it up. Vanamonde (Talk) 02:06, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]