Talk:Arabic poetry

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Arab world High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arab world, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Arab world on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Arab worldWikipedia:WikiProject Arab worldTemplate:WikiProject Arab worldArab world articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Poetry Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poetry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of poetry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoetryWikipedia:WikiProject PoetryTemplate:WikiProject PoetryPoetry articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

"The pre-Islamic poetry is commonly referred to in Arabic as "الشعر الجاهلي" or Jahili poetry, literally "the ignorant poetry". Who commonly to refers to it as that? Are there any other way it is referred to? Since 'ignorant' in this context only means 'ignorant of Islam', there should be an effort to make this clear.

• There is no other way to refer to them, ironically, these poems are more complex and much better than today's poetry--BelalSaid (talk) 01:21, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently, there is an excellent piece in the Times Literary Supplement for October 1, 2004, called "Silent Sirens," by Navid Kermani. Could somebody please have a look and see if that could be a useful reference? - jredmond 20:22, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

On Arabic_literature#Arabic_poetry there is an explanation about the term 'Saj'. This term does not appear in this article about Arabic poetry at all, which is strange. Could someone add it? See also Saj (disambiguation). Wiki-uk 06:31, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Saj' is prose not poetry; not related and should probably be added to Arabic prose (if such an article exists). --Maha Odeh 05:50, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is simply the same rhyme used on every line of a poem. While this may seem a poor rhyme scheme for people used to English literature it makes sense in a language like Arabic which has only three vowels which can be either long or short.

This a POV and it is not accurate, it implies that this is a defect in the language; this can be overturned by a pro-Arabic language to say that English has mulitiple rhymes because the language does not have sufficient vocabulary to support a single rhyme.

Arabic and English are two different languages and work in different ways and accordingly the concept of the vowel in English does not apply to Arabic, which has it's own concept and defenition of a vowel. Also, rhyme in Arabic works in a different way simply because the whole language works in a different way; some Arabic poets do change the rhyme and that is usually considered a defect in their poetry. Except for the first sentance, the whole paragraph should be deleted. --Maha Odeh 05:46, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Basit and tawil should be mentioned. Badagnani (talk) 22:46, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi all,

My Arabic is very poor but I am interested to learn more.

I have just added a new external link: http://www.princeton.edu/~arabic/poetry/

You can read and listen to the poems, very nice! Can someone please find any or all of these poems as texts - I am looking for a soft copy? Or if there are good translations, I am interested as well. Please add it to my talk page, in case I miss your answer. --Atitarev (talk) 22:48, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There is a very high proportion of

In the absence of objection, I've removed the majority. --

talk) 11:37, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

This sentence under Pre-Islamic Poetry seems to make no sense: "This characteristic was later dropped from the Arabic poem and some Arab poets, such as Abu Nuwas, became a target of mockery of pre-Islamic poetry." I think it's probably trying to say, "This characteristic was later dropped and some poets such as Abu Nuwas mocked pre-Islamic poetry for it." Can anyone confirm this?Sartoresartus (talk) 08:21, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what it means. While your suggestion may be true, I don't think it's safe to make that statement without refs. I've removed the sentence - someone who knows the answer should reinstate it more clearly and with refs. --

talk) 11:39, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

The use of the expression "the ignorant poetry" is unacceptable: many ready paraphrases offer themselves with little effort. Please attend to this. see: Jahiliyyah

G. Robert Shiplett 15:09, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

The talk page of

I have just modified one external link on Arabic poetry. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080509162756/http://www.al-bab.com/arab/literature/poetry.htm to http://www.al-bab.com/arab/literature/poetry.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:38, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have recently proposed the deletion of the page Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Sha'ir]. It occurs to me that contributors to this page may have some interest in that discussion. Some of you may agree with me that the page should be removed (perhaps to be replaced by a better page on the topic at a future time). Some of you may disagree with me, & think that the page can be edited into useful shape. If the page ends up staying, perhaps at least some of those watch this page can contribute to making Sha'ir a valuable contribution to Wikipedia. Pathawi (talk) 14:36, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]