Talk:Aston

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Politics of the United Kingdom

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

More information:
/
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

West Midlands Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject West Midlands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of West Midlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.West MidlandsWikipedia:WikiProject West MidlandsTemplate:WikiProject West MidlandsWest Midlands articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Birmingham Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Birmingham, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Birmingham on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BirminghamWikipedia:WikiProject BirminghamTemplate:WikiProject BirminghamBirmingham articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

On ve 21 February 2021 ==, it was proposed that this article be

Aston, Birmingham. The result of the discussion

was moved.

Ethnicity

I've removed the sentence "The population of the area is largely black and South Asian" from the article on the following basis. As per figures from the 2001 census documented on the City Council website here, the largest single ethnic group in Aston ward (which has a total population of 27,923) was Asian or Asian British (i.e. South Asian) with 13,523, then came White with 6,574, then Black or Black British with 5,666. There were also 981 people of mixed race, 133 Chinese and 466 of "Other" ethnicity. In other words, no ethnic group has an absolute majority of the population, and combining the largest ethnic group and the third largest to create a majority is questionable. One might reasonably write that the majority of Aston's citizens are from ethnic minority groups and this will be a fair piece of information when I get round to writing a more extended article. As one of the few pieces of info in the current article, however, (and when juxtaposed with the unsourced comments about crime) this might be read as POV, though of course I am sure this is unintentional. Valiantis 00:15, 12 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Aston Manor

The Aston Manor link on this page just redirects back here. perhaps someone would like to start an article?Lozleader 19:02, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, probably worth doing. I wonder what the term 'Aston' now actually means in local usage these days : the ancient parish included basically all of Birmingham's inner eastern suburbs : which retained the actual name 'Aston'. Morwen - Talk 21:25, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WHY IS THERE NO MENTION OF BLACK SABBATH!

THERE THE TOWNS GREATEST CREATION! LEARN TO SPELL AND PUNCTUATE! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.196.172.86 (talk) 19:55, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

those sensitive emotions apart, I have just edited the section that included the claim that both Ozzy Osbourne and Tonyu Iommi "were born and raced in the city". It may be true that they used to zoom about the place when they were younger, but their raisin' is as reliable as it ever was. 184.41.44.167 (talk) 04:01, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious claim

"Aston has an area of 6.4 km²/ 451.5 hectares. "

Now in the metric system, as normal people understand it, 6.4 km(2) is exactly 640 hectares. Or, 451 hectares is 4.51 sq km.Lathamibird (talk) 06:51, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious claim

"Aston has an area of 6.4 km²/ 451.5 hectares. "

Now in the metric system, as normal people understand it, 6.4 km(2) is exactly 640 hectares. Or, 451 hectares is 4.51 sq km.Lathamibird (talk) 06:52, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Aston. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

Sourcecheck

}}).

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check

}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:57, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Aston (disambiguation) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 20:21, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]