Talk:Augustus FitzRoy, 3rd Duke of Grafton

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Date and place of birth

Noticed that the profile does not include a place of birth so thought I would do a bit of digging and came across the following quote in "The prime ministers of Britain, 1721-1921: with a supplementary chapter to 1924" By Charles Clive Bigham Mersey, Viscount Charles Clive Bigham Mersey p58 - ...third Duke of Grafton, was born on October 9, 1735. See the page at Google books here [1]. The question is which is correct and do we have a place of birth? Bjmullan (talk) 20:14, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It seems he was born in London (User: Giulio Savazzi) — Preceding
talk • contribs) 09:45, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Assessment comment The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Augustus FitzRoy, 3rd Duke of Grafton/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following
several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Well-written and well-organized, just needs some references. Coemgenus 19:10, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 19:10, 27 February 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 08:36, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Augustus FitzRoy, 3rd Duke of Grafton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

Sourcecheck
}}).

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:30, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]