Talk:Australian Guide to Legal Citation

	This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Books inactive .Reference worksWikipedia:WikiProject Reference worksTemplate:WikiProject Reference worksReference works articles

	Law
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Australia: Law Low‑importance

Australian Guide to Legal Citation is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Australian law (assessed as Low-importance). Need help improving this article? Ask a LibrarianWhat's this? at the National Library of Australia. The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Academic Journals

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Academic Journals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Academic Journals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Academic JournalsWikipedia:WikiProject Academic JournalsTemplate:WikiProject Academic JournalsAcademic Journal articles See WikiProject Academic Journals' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Australian Guide to Legal Citation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120331161433/http://subjectguides.library.unsw.edu.au/content.php?pid=38537&sid=685837 to http://subjectguides.library.unsw.edu.au/content.php?pid=38537&sid=685837
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110722025106/http://www.nzlla.org.nz:80/publications.cfm to http://www.nzlla.org.nz/publications.cfm
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.law.unimelb.edu.au/469B9330-4CA2-11E2-95000050568D0140

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:25, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The History section, seemingly informed heavily by Pearl Rozenberg's The Truth is out There, describes eight legal citation guides. But there's no discussion of how the AGLC came to be viewed as the preeminent citation guide (as the introduction suggests), nor a discussion of how those other citation guides informed the development of the AGLC. Is there any reason to bring the others up at all? If so, I am not seeing it right now.

I would appreciate input from anyone with knowledge on this topic, especially in regards to how and why the AGLC became the ascendant citation guide in Australia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.212.199.68 (talk) 03:12, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]