Talk:Awais Leghari

This page is about an active politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. Because of this, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Politics and Government This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance). Pakistan Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.privatisation.gov.pk/Minister-porfile%20%28Awais%20Leghari%29.htm. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see

I have just modified one external link on Awais Leghari. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131212055718/http://www.onlinenews.com.pk/details.php?id=93264 to http://www.onlinenews.com.pk/details.php?id=93264

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:04, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Saqib and Masterpha: federal minister (without portfolio) is clearly an office and the officeholder have a salary and participate to the council of ministers. --Panam2014 (talk) 13:12, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I was about to left a message on your talk page. Being a member of the cabinet (without portfolio) is certainly a position but I don't think it's inclusion in the infobox is suitable. I don't think it will set a good precedent. We may mention it in some bios where there's no other office. --Saqib (talk) 13:18, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Saqib: I disagree. Federal minister without portfolio is still a minister and I have seen many articles about UK ministers without portfolios. There is also a precedent, so how are we going to set a bad one? Examples include: Brandon Lewis, Robert Halfon and Grant Shapps. маsтегрнатаLк 13:29, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Saqib: 25 September was a mistake. It was the date of the article. Also, thank you for adding the true date. For the end date, it is the date when a portfolio have been allowed to him. --Panam2014 (talk) 13:33, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OK lets re-add it since now we've accurate term dates. --Saqib (talk) 13:34, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]