Talk:BBC News at One

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

BBC Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Tasks for WikiProject BBC: edit history watch purge Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Chucklevision - references and general clean-up, Pebble Mill Studios - over-detailed and long, BBC World Service Television - unreferenced and confusing Copyedit : BBC News, Broadcasting House Expand : Top 20 start-class BBC articles with most importance: BBC Japan, BBC World Service Television, BBC Lifestyle, BBC Two Northern Ireland NPOV : Criticism of the BBC (See comments) Stubs : Stub-Class BBC articles Other : *Restructure the category Add infoboxes to the BBC articles without infoboxes Add free-use images to biographical articles where possible Add references to assessment) and Coat of arms of the BBC Return Dad's Army to a Good article. (See comments) Reassess BBC following improvements to article.

The image

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
• That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --08:36, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

BBC News channel changed its logo recently, therefore I uploaded a new version of programme titles with the new logo. Edit was reverted by David J Johnson ‎as "unnecessary" (then this edit changing the logo on BBC News page is maybe also "unnecessary"). If someone considers the usage of current programme titles important, you can put the file into the infobox again (the same with BBC News at Five). --Luky001 (talk) 10:32, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The upload showing the "rebrand" is so small, even an ex-typographer and security printer, like myself, cannot see the change. David J Johnson (talk) 10:44, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't what you see kind of subjective? But I am curious what your reasons for not changing it are... Am I wasting space on Wikimedia Commons (file was uploaded already)? Or is one revision with the change of the picture gonna take too much space on Wikimedia servers? I know it is a detail but details matter too, not just the bigger picture. --Luky001 (talk) 12:30, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]