Talk:Baclayon Church

Baclayon Church has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: January 17, 2015. (Reviewed version).

A fact from Baclayon Church appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 3 December 2014 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the
baptistry of Baclayon Church (interior pictured) has an unusual retablo housing the Santo Entierro in a glass coffin and the Nuestra Señora de los Dolores in the central niche?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2014/December. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Baclayon Church.

Wikipedia

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Catholicism Low‑importance

Baclayon Church is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Catholicism task list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Sanctification; Westminster Cathedral
Other : Watch recent changes

for Catholicism articles

Historic sites Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tambayan Philippines Mid‑importance

	the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

GA Review

This review is
transcluded from Talk:Baclayon Church/GA1
. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer:

23W (talk · contribs) 00:15, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

here
for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (
lists
):

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (
reliable sources): c (OR
):

It is broad in its coverage.
a (
focused
):

It follows the neutral point of view
policy.
Fair representation without bias:

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:

It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have
suitable captions
):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Comments

I see one {{
clarification needed
}} tag in the lead.

Clarified. --Carlojoseph14 (talk) 15:07, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Manual of Style
suggests
the lead should be two paragraphs. The last sentence by itself can probably be merged into the preceding paragraph.

Done. Merged. --Carlojoseph14 (talk) 15:07, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The two one-sentence paragraphs in the history section should probably be merged into the preceding paragraphs, if logical.

Done. Merged. I think it is logical --Carlojoseph14 (talk) 15:07, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the headings, is "Retablo" supposed to be capitalized? It's set in lowercase in the body and captions.

Noted, changes done. --Carlojoseph14 (talk) 15:07, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Some redundant in-line citations can probably be eliminated (i.e., remove references from the end of consecutive sentences if they're the same reference number).

Noted, changes done. --Carlojoseph14 (talk) 15:07, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Toolbox tools turned up nothin' major, so that's good.

Nice work for a beautiful church; sad about the earthquake. ;( On hold for two weeks.
23W 00:40, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

@
23W:, Please see my reply after each comments. Thanks. --Carlojoseph14 (talk) 15:07, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply
]
Hi @
23W:, you might want to review the nomination. Thanks. --Carlojoseph14 (talk) 14:25, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply
]
@
23W 23:26, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

@
23W 22:14, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Baclayon Church. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141018160438/http://nhcp.gov.ph/files/NHI_res_3_1994.pdf to http://nhcp.gov.ph/files/NHI_res_3_1994.pdf

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141013135936/http://nhcp.gov.ph/heritage-churches-in-bohol-undergo-pre-restoration-work/ to http://nhcp.gov.ph/heritage-churches-in-bohol-undergo-pre-restoration-work/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck
}}).
This message was posted before February 2018.
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.

If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:51, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Baclayon Church. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140217151913/http://comcat.cr.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/usb000kdb4 to http://comcat.cr.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/usb000kdb4

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.tagbilarandiocese.org/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.

If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:19, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

English

Baclayon church body 175.176.67.97 (talk) 16:53, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Baclayon_Church&oldid=1205595229"