Talk:Baltic Exchange

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Ships This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles Transport: Maritime C‑class ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Maritime task force (assessed as Mid-importance). London Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

What? No picture of the former building? Might be interesting to see what was lost before the introduction of the 'gherkin'.

68.71.8.51 (talk) 13:47, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Seconded. Especially as the Gherkin article strongly implies that this article does contain an image of the old building. Rhialto (talk) 18:26, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm interested in this too, but searching Flickr only found photos of salvaged stained glass windows from the building and an old photo of a minor part of the building. Commons doesn't have anything. Where else can we look? Dreamyshade (talk) 05:51, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"The Baltic Exchange is the world's only independent source of maritime market information..." seems like an advertisement, need sources — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gendalv (talk • contribs) 19:12, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

correct, this was a stub, directly quoted from the Exchange website. Edmond8674 (talk) 14:59, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Probably justifies a separate article, don't you think so? Edmond8674 (talk) 00:31, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed - I have moved all the material on the former building, including that referring to the bombing, to a separate article. Dormskirk (talk) 23:25, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]