Talk:Bartnicki v. Vopper

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

United States: Government Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Low-importance). Law Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. U.S. Supreme Court cases This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): P m c 1 2 3 4 5.

Above undated message substituted from

I unlinked the word "cabin." The internal link referred to nothing related to this use, Wiktionary also has no relevant definition, and to link to this definition (number 9) seems pointless. --Cory Kohn 17:51, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think the holding in this case is even narrower. It was more than just that the radio station had clean hands, it was also that the conversation was a matter of public interest. Phyrkrakr (talk) A problem with this article is that it gives no background whatsoever, meaning that there is no explanation as to what the cause of the case was. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.246.84.7 (talk) 03:02, 13 June 2013 (UTC) Actually, more accurately, although not as bad as some other articles, it merely needs more detail in the background, though it does have one. Perhaps an administrator will step in and help us figure it out. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.59.202.30 (talk) 05:37, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]