Talk:Battle of Chochiwon
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Battle of Chochiwon article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated A-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
United States Low‑importance | |||||||
|
project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible. |
GA Review
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Battle of Chochiwon/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
I reviewed the article using
talk
) 18:37, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
Reviewer: talk) 18:37, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
]
Battle of Chochiwon has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Battle of Chochiwon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100824070436/http://www.usarj.army.mil/history/tfsmith.aspx to http://www.usarj.army.mil/history/tfsmith.aspx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
{{source check
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:27, 12 May 2017 (UTC)