Talk:Bedok Reservoir MRT station

This review is

transcluded from Talk:Bedok Reservoir MRT station/GA1

. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: ZKang123 (talk · contribs) 06:52, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: CosXZ (talk · contribs) 19:35, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@ZKang123: I have some stuff I need you to do under 3B CosXZ (talk) 23:58, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed per suggestions, except for "official station code" and "easier access".--01:52, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

Ok I understand CosXZ (talk) 14:29, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b ( lists ): It is factually accurate and source spot-check . a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism ): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have suitable captions ):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

Comments

1A

Y CosXZ (talk) 23:53, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

1B

lead/lede

Y CosXZ (talk) 21:22, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

layout

Y CosXZ (talk) 21:39, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

word choice

Y CosXZ (talk) 21:50, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:stations guidelines

Y CosXZ (talk) 21:34, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2A

Looks great CosXZ (talk) 19:35, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2B

• [1][2][3][4][5][8][9][11][14][16][17][19][20] Y primary source
• [6][7][15] Y
• [10] Y map
• [12][18] Y primary source
• [13] Y company that installed the artwork

Overall looks good CosXZ (talk) 19:35, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2C

Y CosXZ (talk) 23:48, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2D

Earwig found nothing too concerning CosXZ (talk) 21:07, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

3A

Y CosXZ (talk) 23:23, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

3B

lead/lede

• The station was first announced in August 2010 when the DTL Stage 3 stations were revealed.

History

• The station was first announced on 20 August 2010 along with the 16 stations of the 21-kilometre (13 mi) Downtown line Stage 3 (DTL3) from the River Valley (now Fort Canning) to Expo stations. The line segment was expected to be completed in 2017.
• A key challenge of the station's construction involved the temporarily diversion of an existing canal for the implementation of the diaphragm wall. And link 'diaphragm wall'
• The expanded canal was restored upon the completion of the station box.
• On 31 May 2017, the Land Transport Authority (LTA) announced that the station, together with the rest of DTL3, would be opened on 21 October that year.

Details

• The official station code is DT30.
• the station design incorporated bold palettes and sculpture-inspired designs as part of the "Station in the Park" concept.
• Wider fare gates allow easier access for wheelchair users into the station.
• The message was a straightforward line that Ng hoped to remind commuters how far they are from their dreams. And replace 'line' with 'phrase'
• The artist initially proposed a literal illustration of the water cycle,

4

Y CosXZ (talk) 23:34, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

5

Very stable CosXZ (talk) 19:35, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

6A

Good copyright CosXZ (talk) 15:46, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

6B

Y CosXZ (talk) 15:46, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Other comments

• ... that Bedok Reservoir MRT station features a public artwork including a message that "dribbles down" the lift shaft in motifs of droplets? Source: Zhuang, Justin; Soh, Darren (2022). Art in Transit: Downtown Line Singapore. Singapore: Land Transport Authority. ISBN 978-981-18-3967-2. OCLC 1342054525. (p168)
  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Regine Rocks

ZKang123 (talk) 05:07, 19 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

• General eligibility:
• New enough:
• Long enough:
• Other problems:

Overall:

Here's the excerpt of the page for your perusal.--ZKang123 (talk) 09:28, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@

in-text attribution is added to the article, this should be good to go.—Bagumba (talk) 15:08, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

@Bagumba: fixed.--ZKang123 (talk) 10:08, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@ZKang123: Sorry if it wasn't clear. I meant that the article needed in-text attribution added as to who said "dribbles down". I'm neutral on whether it needs to be in the hook or not. Regards.—Bagumba (talk) 10:17, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh I see. Will fix that haha. Ok, done.--ZKang123 (talk) 10:19, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@ZKang123: In the snapshot of the source you linked above, "dribbles down" wasn't quoted. Wouldn't that mean that those specific words should be attributed to Zhuang and Soh, the source's authors?—Bagumba (talk) 10:33, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edited accordingly.--ZKang123 (talk) 12:48, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Approved. @ZKang123: It seems that Soh was a photographer and not listed as an author, so I tweaked the attribution to Zhuang only. Feel free to modify if I'm wrong.—Bagumba (talk) 15:58, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]