Talk:Bhartṛhari
This level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
The contents of the Bhartrhari's paradox page were merged into Bhartṛhari on 10 March 2019. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
How many people?
Is this article about two people? There seem to be Bhartṛhari the grammarian, Bhartṛhari the philosopher-poet, and Bharthari the king's brother. Shreevatsa (talk) 16:26, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
it may be exaggerated to disambiguate here. The best approach might be to keep three articles,
- Sounds like a good idea. I'll get to it to sometime myself, if you don't beat me to it. (I was wondering a little whether Śatakatraya is fine, since the original work doesn't call it that, and it's just used as a convenient name for "the three Śatakas", but it appears to be common enough.) Shreevatsa (talk) 14:47, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
- Done now, more or less. The text can be improved, but the articles are at the right places. Shreevatsa (talk) 07:45, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
Mahabhasya commentary
Apparently a commentary to Patanjali's Mahabhasya is also attributed to Bhartrhari. This is a very obscure text apparently received only via a single incomplete ms. and it is rather questionable how seriously this "attribution" is to be taken. The piece of information was inserted by
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Bhartṛhari. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121025095040/http://www.cgjungpage.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=916&Itemid=1 to http://www.cgjungpage.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=916&Itemid=1
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
{{source check
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:07, 1 November 2016 (UTC)