Talk:Biblioscape
This article was nominated for deletion on 2007-12-01. The result of the discussion was Keep. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Other entry like http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ProCite also has one line. I have not seen the page that was first created for this entry. I do not know why it was deleted. Is there a way to see it?
- ProCite is developed by non-notable and therefore seems like advertising (although I think the proper tag should have been notability, not blatant advertising). Tucker001 (talk | contribs) 04:10, 20 November 2007 (UTC)]
Google ranks the home page of a web site. If you have google toolbar, it will be displayed on the toolbar. If you do a google search of Biblioscape, it has 2.5 million hits. If you go to "More | Books", Biblioscape has been mentioned in 27 books. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Xiannong (talk • contribs) 16:00, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
- Then put some of this information into the article. I'm not trying to be mean here; we insist on information from impartial third-party sources to verify notability and detailed claims. "It's on google" does not constitute proper sourcing of information. --Orange Mike | Talk 16:17, 20 November 2007 (UTC)]
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Biblioscape. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071030000135/http://www.researchinformation.info:80/rispring03review_notabene_biblioscape.html to http://www.researchinformation.info/rispring03review_notabene_biblioscape.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
{{source check
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:40, 1 November 2016 (UTC)