Talk:BioMed Central

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Medicine Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Open Access High‑importance BioMed Central is part of WikiProject Open Access, a collaborative attempt at improving the coverage of topics related to Open Access and at improving other articles with the help of materials from Open Access sources. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Open AccessWikipedia:WikiProject Open/Open access task forceTemplate:WikiProject Open AccessOpen access articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Open Access to-do list: edit history watch purge Here are some tasks awaiting attention: assess ; Check media files uploaded by the Open Access Media Importer for missing or incomplete categorization or lack of descriptions, or put the files into suitable Wikipedia articles. See also recent uploads of open-access files more generally. inactive .OpenWikipedia:WikiProject OpenTemplate:WikiProject OpenOpen articles

To-do list for BioMed Central: edit · history · watch · refresh · Updated 2012-03-15 Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : It's rather odd that the only discussion in the article on BioMed regarding BioMed's method of financing its operations is that Yale once paid page charges for affiliated authors and now doesn't. The BioMed article needs to discuss BioMed's financing model in some detail and in some depth before such a random fact might become meaningful. - Nunh-huh 07:51, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Are all the references really useful? Calimo (talk) 16:56, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Peoples Archive is now called Web of Stories, please consider changing the link within History to Web of Stories.

Fitzrovia calling (talk) 13:12, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Only short stub that could easily be accommodated in the article on the publisher (much of it is already there). Randykitty (talk) 15:11, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support, not notable independently of the publisher of all of those journals.

talk to me 21:48, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

Support: lists are not supposed to be an exhaustive directory (

Fgnievinski (talk) 01:01, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

I have just modified one external link on BioMed Central. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20041229160839/http://www.biomedcentral.com:80/meetings/2000/foi/transcripts/godlee to http://www.biomedcentral.com/meetings/2000/foi/transcripts/godlee

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:39, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on BioMed Central. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060113103728/http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/326/7403/1350-d to http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/326/7403/1350-d
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.biomedcentral.com/meetings/2000/foi/transcripts/godlee
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061010025124/http://www.carl-abrc.ca/projects/scholarly_communication/pdf/biomed_central-e.PDF to http://www.carl-abrc.ca/projects/scholarly_communication/pdf/biomed_central-e.PDF
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.pubmedcentral.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=153166
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080703172617/http://www.sciencenavigation.com/about.asp to http://sciencenavigation.com/about.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:37, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]