Talk:Bisexual pornography

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

LGBT studies This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles Pornography Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pornography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of pornography-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PornographyWikipedia:WikiProject PornographyTemplate:WikiProject PornographyPornography articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Did we really need to have a page explaining what a "bisexual pornographic movie" was? Jesus. 71.11.205.79 23:47, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Quite agree. ~

Hey hi, all, As the person who started this page, I feel compelled to defend its existence. There are people out there who are interested in bisexual porn, or might be interested, or think they might be interested, but they're not sure, because they don't know what it is. I'm thinking especially of jr. bisexuals, the bi-curious, and women who get turned on by the idea of being with two men. Hope that helps. (By the way, the entry has been updated since I wrote it, and I have to say, I'm very pleased with the person(s) who tightened up the writing and added the painting by E.-H. Avril.) VickieP 06:13, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Of course we "really need" to have a page like this. It is very well written, and isn't even remotely close to being the most useless page on Wikipedia. Additionally, the genre of bisexual pornography is hardly self-explanatory for many people, and demystifying the content and genre is quite important for those that aren't otherwise knowledgeable. --68.9.134.158 00:23, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree this is a keeper, bisexual porno is different from gay porno and any other kind of porno for fact, thank you wikipedia!Bronayur 04:06, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

For anyone who doesnt think the topic is notable, or who wants to improve the article > [1] Willy turner (talk) 16:43, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article as written makes it sound like this doesn't exist. There's quite a lot of it (consumed by heterosexual men). deisenbe (talk) 20:27, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This kind of Bisexual Pornography belongs just like Mainstream Lesbian Pornography to the Heterosexual Pornography.--193.196.64.2 (talk) 11:14, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nice

Frederick's frasiscer (talk) 13:21, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Add some more men, it's too much geared towards women right now, the main audience of bi porn is doubtlessly bi/gay men.Miacek (talk) 14:50, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Its of no you 41.211.35.214 (talk) 21:24, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]