Talk:Blue Network
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | Blue Network received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
Footnotes
I would advise using
In the event you didn't see this elsewhere, thank you for the suggestion, and the pointer. I'll try to work this in, and see what happens. Eric O. Costello 13:57, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
A classification
Article is comprehensive, helpfully detailed, superbly sourced, and clearly written. After copyediting and a few formatting tweaks, it should be able to move to FAC shortly.—DCGeist 21:33, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
"NBC Blue" to just "Blue"
This article says this radio network, originally "NBC Blue," was called "Blue" from 1942 to 1945. The article NBC says Edward Noble bought it from NBC and dropped that part of the name in 1943, the following year. Can anyone confirm which is right, so we can make the articles consistent? Ted Watson 20:00, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
I've responded to this at your talk page, T.W. Eric O. Costello 01:40, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:WFCI2.jpg
Please go to
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
File:LuxBlue34.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion
|
An image used in this article, File:LuxBlue34.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 3 December 2011
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- talk) 12:35, 3 December 2011 (UTC) ]
|
Assessment comment
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Blue Network/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.Might well qualify for GA candidate. Only real glaring objection I see is a formal lack of references/sources cited, independent of the footnote section. Badbilltucker 19:43, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
Hmm! Do you mean a "references" list, with a separate break-out of the magazines, books, pamplets, &c. cited? Eric O. Costello 03:52, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
Last edited at 03:52, 7 January 2007 (UTC).
Substituted at 09:52, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
Todius Barnard LaRoche
Who is this person? They're referred to as a grandson of one of the people who bought the Blue Network in 1943, but I can't see how this is relevant. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eric O. Costello (talk • contribs) 01:37, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
| Might well qualify for GA candidate. Only real glaring objection I see is a formal lack of references/sources cited, independent of the footnote section. Badbilltucker 19:43, 6 January 2007 (UTC) Hmm! Do you mean a "references" list, with a separate break-out of the magazines, books, pamplets, &c. cited? Eric O. Costello 03:52, 7 January 2007 (UTC) |
Last edited at 03:52, 7 January 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 09:52, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
Todius Barnard LaRoche
Who is this person? They're referred to as a grandson of one of the people who bought the Blue Network in 1943, but I can't see how this is relevant. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eric O. Costello (talk • contribs) 01:37, 8 August 2022 (UTC)