Talk:Board of Deputies of British Jews

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Ireland Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Jewish history Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jewish history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jewish history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jewish historyWikipedia:WikiProject Jewish historyTemplate:WikiProject Jewish historyJewish history-related articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United Kingdom Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Northern Ireland Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Northern Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Northern Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Northern IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject Northern IrelandTemplate:WikiProject Northern IrelandNorthern Ireland-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This is a good article, but it really needs to be more heavily sourced.Jamal (talk) 23:22, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Sharon Sadeh, Palestinian charity sues British Jewry over terror slur reprinted from Haaretz, March 25, 2004.

I'm embarassed I didn't even notice it was a David Irving page since his name is all over it. On the other hand it is an interesting test of conclusions reached in these four Reliable Source Board discussions on Reprints of Reliable Source articles, documents by less or non-reliable sources: #1, #2, #3, #4

And of course one can always just take off the link!

• As for the Interpal press release: "InterPal wins Libel Case Against Board of Deputies of British Jews,"
  News release 22 December 2005, accessed 9 February 2007.^{[dead link}
  ]

Meanwhile this is what has been said about Organizations Quotes about self, press releases: #1, #2

Anyway there do seem to be other sources, especially on the press release. When I get a chance. CarolMooreDC (talk) 08:38, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Board of Deputies of British Jews. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131023155653/http://www.bod.org.uk/live/content.php?Category_ID=14 to http://www.bod.org.uk/live/content.php?Category_ID=14

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:10, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Can editors please provide justification for the assertion that sources 13 and 14 are unreliable. This assertion seems equally partisan and arbitrary. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.179.208.92 (talk) 22:15, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On the article about the Catholic Church, for example, we mention the activities of misbehaving priests, not only in the body of the article, but in the introduction. Shouldn't the same be applied here, in regards to Mr. Greville Janner, who actually led this organisation? Claíomh Solais (talk) 14:22, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted this + added a secondary source at some distance from events. continuing coverage of this does not mention Livingstone's relationship with the Evening Standard (or Daily Mail), and this is irrelevant to the Board's protest over this language. Icewhiz (talk) 07:14, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is quite a long list and rather dominates the article; I do not see such a list in articles on other organizations. Perhaps it should be made into a new separate article. Jontel (talk) 06:54, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No. A full list of past presidents in this article is entirely appropriate. Not sure what the relevance of other organisations is. Nor does Jontel give a statistical basis for the assertion. Many articles contain long lists of, e.g. notable alumni. Dori1951 (talk) 11:40, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]