Talk:Boddington, Northamptonshire

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Northamptonshire Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Northamptonshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Northamptonshire-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorthamptonshireWikipedia:WikiProject NorthamptonshireTemplate:WikiProject NorthamptonshireNorthamptonshire articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. UK geography Low‑importance Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. England Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The article includes in its references "local residents" which would indicate that imformation being provided is through original research. -- Whpq (talk) 15:28, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Boddington, Northamptonshire. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081002143220/http://www.boddingtonparish.co.uk:80/the_boddingtons/index.htm to http://www.boddingtonparish.co.uk/the_boddingtons/index.htm
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.boddington.northants.sch.uk/Prospectus.aspx
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081028005733/http://www.bbm69.co.uk:80/crash.html to http://www.bbm69.co.uk/crash.html
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.boddington.northants.sch.uk/Ofsted.aspx
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080922044602/http://www.thevillagegarage.co.uk:80/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=26&Itemid=35 to http://www.thevillagegarage.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=26&Itemid=35
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081002143220/http://www.boddingtonparish.co.uk:80/the_boddingtons/index.htm to http://www.boddingtonparish.co.uk/the_boddingtons/index.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:09, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Boddington, Northamptonshire. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081002143220/http://www.boddingtonparish.co.uk/the_boddingtons/index.htm to http://www.boddingtonparish.co.uk/the_boddingtons/index.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:15, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Would someone please check the data that goes with this quotation:

"According to the 2001 census it had a population of 700,[1] 240 male, 252 female in 196 households"

That's an awful lot of invisible people. --Oldontarian (talk) 10:32, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]