Talk:Botch (professional wrestling)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Botch

Do we need this article? I know there's a list of "memorable" botches, but that's POV. The word botch has the exact same meaning in everyday context as it does in professional wrestling and besides, Wikipedia is not a dictionary. I'll redirect it to the article on

professional wrestling slang. --Jtalledo (talk) 05:09, 20 October 2005 (UTC)[reply
]

You completely miss the point - you are correct, it is not a dictionary - but the article explains how "botch" fits into the context of wrestling, not a general definition of botch. My feeling is that having some examples of wrestling botches is helpful, and enough to justify have an explanatory article about what happens and that a wrestling botch can be fatal. Other than maybe a "botched" surgery, most botches in the general sense are not life-or-death. --CokeBear 10:21, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Edited the Owen Hart fall. He fell 78 feet as documented by the best source I could find. [1]

Botches

  • This is a fun page but in the interests of keeping it encyclopedic, the list should really only contain memorable or significant botches. Just because you saw Cena miss a move on Raw the other day, doesn't necessarily make it a list-worthy botch. Wrestlers botch all the time, if it causes injury or major embarrassment then consider adding it to the list. I also encourage others to prune the list as aggressively as they see fit, nothing here is verified so Jimbo's "aggressive removal of unverified information" edict should override any objections. Deizio talk 13:47, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed, this is turning into a near-weekly update page just because slight errors are almost guaranteed to happen every show. Stuff like the Gayda/Stratus bulldog and the Owen Hart piledriver are famous examples, but look at the stuff from Summerslam '06 that is listed...no one even remembers that now, and it's only a few weeks later. KaneRobot 22:51, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why is the Triple H/Mr Mcmahon 'botch' on there. It is just a minor mistake in the match which should not be up there. I agree with the people above in that only famous botches should be on there.60.227.99.12 06:45, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Now I agree with most of the rulings on significant botches, because it defenintly helps clean up the article, but I DO think that we need one botch not on the list to be in there. I think the Big Show-Sabu match at SSLAM 06 should be listed with the biggest one from the match, because that is what many people seem to remember the most from that event (though given it was a somewhat lackluster event) and SummerSlam is generally thought of as the 2nd biggest PPV of the year. - JSelby posted this at 17:11, 7 October 2006 (EST)

Okay, here's a few botches that I'd like to consult wether are they or not worthy of being in the page (since there's lots of guys that enjoy randomly deleting stuff and I do not intend to add this stuff if it's up for deletion) I'm talking about Kane botching a Flying Clothesline to RVD in Summerslam 03, Kurt Angle breaking Bob Holly's arm with a Moonsault, Goldberg spearing the ring post face first, Brock Lesnar powerbombing Holly on his neck, Lesnar giving A-Train the F-5 on his head AND, The Shockmaster!!! LOL. So what you guys think? (If you are unaware of these botches I assure they're memorable, so I'll wait a couple of days for an answer before editing the article)Vicius 06:55, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

!?!?!?!?

Why is the list of botches shorter!?!? Torax2 04:21, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

a better question would be why do they delete legitimate botches? Trish was deleted (even though it was a legit botch and fell into the context of the meaning at the top) as was the Owen hart fall (unless we are to belive him dying was scripted).

I'm just fallowing the definition, so either change the definition or quit deleting legitimate botches. –—Traiklin 16:02, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted list of botches

I deleted the list of botches. First off, there's no established criteria for what a "notable" botch is so it might be

Wikipedia:Embedded lists, lists make Wikipedia worse, not better. --Jtalledo (talk) 20:49, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply
]

Instead of the list, an example of a single botch illustrating a certain point like the one with
cited. --Jtalledo (talk) 20:51, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply
]

Notable botches

I like this page. Although I think from the paragraph that starts 'at wrestlemania 23...' should be deleted. Those last few paragraphs don't seem to have anything to do with the rest of the article at all.

Help Citing it

I wrote the paragraph on Sean Waltman's botch victory over Scott Hall, and someone is asking for citation. Can someone help me? I know this happened, because 1) I saw it live, and 2) The fact that it was not planned was broadcast all over the news at that time. I really have no other "citation" besides that, but I figured that was enough. Can anyone help me? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.184.236.13 (talk) 17:08, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've never heard anything about it being anything other than planned. You better find a source pretty quickly, or it will get deleted. PhoenixLink 19:33, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm still not sold as to the purpose of this page. As said a year and a half ago, "botch" has the exact same meaning in real life as it does in wrestling. Somehow, thanks to articles like this, you have people throwing the word around like it's some unique smarky insider term. It's not. PeteF3 21:43, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why

Why was the owen Hart fall listed as 90 foot? I changed it to 78 feet like it actually was....

List

There Should be a list of Many BotchesJoe ferst (talk) 02:47, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hell in a Cell 'botch'

This section reads like it is written by a fanboy mark. It is plainly obvious to anyone watching the video of the match that there entire match was worked, including Foley getting off the stretcher and even the falling roof panel. Unless you honestly believe The Undertaker chased out everyone who was giving him 'medical attention' to continue. Had that been legit, the match would have stopped right there. The fact that The Undertaker continues afterwards is the proof it was worked. Are there any legitimate outside references that prove this was legit? The 'Hell in a Cell' article on wiki also claims this to be 'real' without any references either. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.173.132.226 (talk) 07:26, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

He didn't land on the announce table the way he was intended to land, so the impact was much worse than intended. If you watch the video, he barely hits the table and lands more on the edge. From what it looks like, they were just going to call the match there since it still had the desired finish of Undertaker as the winner, but Foley changed his mind and continued it anyway. Also, his tooth and jaw were clearly unscripted, so even if the roof panel was supposed to happen, knocking a tooth out wasn't.174.125.118.62 (talk) 10:15, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pro Wrestling Botches And Fails

Check it out: http://www.prowrestlingbotchesandfails.wikia.com It's like a wikipedia of botches. If you can please help me and add stuff to it. I created it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.219.87.128 (talk) 12:48, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

1) A link to a blog promoting a YouTube channel. 2) It calls itself "Pro Wrestling" Botches and Fails, though the content is almostly entirely WWE-centered. Where's Jim Cornette selling Robert Gibson's dropkick that clearly didn't make any contact? Just asking if there's any objection to deleting this section as irrelevant to the scope of the talk page.RadioKAOS (talk) 15:16, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, now that I think of it, take that list above.RadioKAOS (talk) 15:18, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Blading (professional wrestling) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 14:14, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Botchamania / Botch discussion

I feel as though the Botchamania (Internet collaboration of infamous botches) series would be of benefit being mentioned on this page. It has been mentioned on quite a few different articles; and whilst probably not noteworthy in of itself a full article; this would be the most logical place for a mention of Botchamania. It would also help explain why the word 'botch' has become more mainstream.

I understand there may be complications regarding Botchamania being a highly pirated/copywright infringing show; however, the website itself (including blog posts, event reviews and such) do not have the same issue.

Botches in of themselves are very POV; except on those occasions where those involve refer to the incedent as a botch; or clear injuries are sustained which could never be argued was the 'goal' of the move/promo/spot. I would say most workers would agree that most if not all matches have 'botches' that are covered up; as it's impossible to be completely infaluable.

There are also no mention of referee botches. There have been many instances of referees botching entire matches, or finishes; with DQ finishes to planned pinfall matches, pinfalls with too many counts, or not counting the fall on clear finishes where the wrestler does not kick out (Think No Way Out 2001 with Earl Hepner).

Lee Vilenski (talk) 09:10, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]