Talk:Boyz (Jesy Nelson song)
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Semi-protected edit request on 19 December 2021
2A00:23C4:3E07:7500:7143:A9E8:BD25:C096 (talk) 21:54, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Page unprotected
The page was protected for no reason. Would it be possible to unprotect it. 2A00:23C4:3E07:7500:7143:A9E8:BD25:C096 (talk) 21:55, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
- Pages are not protected without a reason. At the time this was protected, several unregistered editors were adding nonsense to the page.[1] The page will be unprotected until 12 January 2022. ]
August 2022
Fyi,
chat (they/them) 18:36, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
]
- Being the creator of a page doesn't warrant you the credentials to ]
- I'm not acting like I own the page, I just don't appreciate your tone that I don't know anything about this article topic. *Specifically* mentioning that all critics criticized the "diction and tone" of the song when only one article says that is clear SYNT. Plus, the article is so short that people would be able to see the critical reception section anyways on a regular computer monitor. Makes no sense to keep it in the lead. chat (they/them) 18:48, 13 August 2022 (UTC)]
- I'm not acting like I own the page, I just don't appreciate your tone that I don't know anything about this article topic. *Specifically* mentioning that all critics criticized the "diction and tone" of the song when only one article says that is clear SYNT. Plus, the article is so short that people would be able to see the critical reception section anyways on a regular computer monitor. Makes no sense to keep it in the lead.
Songwriters section vandalized/Excessive bias on critical reception and song background
![]() | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
The songwriters section is completely vandalized, obviously by a troll, with random joke names instead of the actual songwriters with no citation given. In regards to the "Critical reception" and main description sections, the page includes references to the drama surrounding the song with very few citations, mostly going off of one single article and seemingly writing their own opinion more than actual information about the situation. Highly request that the page be reviewed and edited. 189.159.114.234 (talk) 05:46, 10 October 2022 (UTC)