Talk:Brain-derived neurotrophic factor

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Brain-derived neurotrophic factor article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 2 months

project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Molecular and Cell Biology task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Physiology Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysiologyWikipedia:WikiProject PhysiologyTemplate:WikiProject PhysiologyPhysiology Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. This article has not yet been associated with a particular area.

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Brain-derived neurotrophic factor. PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles) The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine. Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

I've also removed the reference to the study backing that claim, as it hasn't been replicated, is an animal-only study, and I can't find any evidence of human trials at all. Curcumin's page on Wikipedia (currently) says "Curcumin has no confirmed medical use in spite of efforts to find one via both laboratory and clinical research. It is difficult to study because it is both unstable and not bioavailable. It is unlikely to produce useful leads for drug development" with a citation. The article also details why it's so unlikely that curcumin would have any positive physiological effect were it to actually enter the bloodstream in a significant quantity. It later references a 2017 meta-analysis finding no reliable evidence that curcumin does anything useful at all. Naptastic (talk) 03:53, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Good article!

"The expression of reelin by Cajal–Retzius cells goes down during development under the influence of BDNF."

Is there a more elegant wording than "goes down"? "is reduced"? "is suppressed"?

And "It binds carboxypeptidase E (CPE), and disruption of this binding has been proposed to cause the loss of sorting BDNF into dense-core vesicles."

Could it be "has been proposed to stop the sorting of BDNF into dense-core vesicles."?

Tony (talk) 12:48, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]