Talk:Brexit negotiations
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Brexit negotiations article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
Text and/or other creative content from this version of Brexit – immediate outcome of no-deal exit with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Daily page views
|
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Currently we don't have a section on the Irish backstop???
I came to this article looking for some material on the final form of the backstop (all UK in the CU, NI also in the SM) that I could use in the Irish backstop article. I was rather surprised that we don't have anything, especially when it was one of just three strands that had dedicated negotiations. (Brexit negotiations in 2018 sort of has it but it is not easy to get the essentials). I've been too involved in revising and concising {sic?) the Backstop article to do this as well, so would someone else care to write a summary here?
World Trade Organization vs World Trade Organisation
I have just seen that World Trade Organisation has been renamed as World Trade Organization.
Is this British? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.136.216.144 (talk) 15:25, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
- No, they have always spelt it with a Z. Wikipedia just copies. --talk) 15:29, 30 November 2019 (UTC)]
New post-Brexit Brexit negotiations
There are still negotiations. We need to figure out how to best handle these. An IP user have made
But how do we integrate it into this article? Does "Brexit negotiations" only refer to the withdrawal negotiations? Or should we rename this to something like "Brexit withdrawal negotiations", and then call the other something like "Brexit partnership negotiations", and should "Brexit negotiations" then be a disambig or an overview article? I don't know, what do other think? ― Hebsen (talk) 00:10, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
- "Post-Brexit negotiations in 2020"? (which maybe we should have anyway, for the same reason as we have talk) 00:21, 6 March 2020 (UTC)]
- Pre-Brexit negotiation were mainly the negotiation of, if you allow my a pleonasm, a Brexit withdrawal agreement, that is a UK/EU Withdrawal agreement negotiation.
- That agreement, its political declaration, plans an ambitious, broad, deep and flexible partnership covering trade, economic cooperation and security.
- In the EU it is named: Negotiation rounds on the future partnership between the European Union and the United Kingdom https://ec.europa.eu/info/european-union-and-united-kingdom-forging-new-partnership/future-partnership_en
- It could be created as UK-EU partnership negotiation, or to use the trademark: UK-EU post-Brexit partnership negotiation — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.136.214.49 (talk) 17:01, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
- It is not a draft: Trade deal negotiation between the UK and EU — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.136.214.49 (talk) 21:39, 7 March 2020 (UTC)]
- And it is in serious need of copyediting, I don't have time now, could others oblige? --talk) 11:24, 8 March 2020 (UTC)]
- And it is in serious need of copyediting, I don't have time now, could others oblige? --
- It is not a draft:
Out of date
@
- "EU negotiators have stated that an agreement must be reached between Britain and the EU by October 2018"
- "The UK benefits from a rebate which reduces its contribution to the EU budget"
- "The British Government's estimate of the financial settlement in March 2019 is £37.8 billion"
etc. The whole article could do with a fine-comb walk-through with latest sources. — Amakuru (talk) 14:25, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
- @talk) 15:53, 5 June 2023 (UTC)]
- Yeah I suppose so. I don't really have time to work on this right now unfortunately, but I just got the impression that the article generally had ground to a halt in early 2020, with no reference to subsequent developments and scholarship. Cheers — Amakuru (talk) 16:09, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
- You are certainly not wrong there. I guess too many editors had lost the will to live by then. Is there a talk) 18:23, 5 June 2023 (UTC)]
- You are certainly not wrong there. I guess too many editors had lost the will to live by then. Is there a
- Yeah I suppose so. I don't really have time to work on this right now unfortunately, but I just got the impression that the article generally had ground to a halt in early 2020, with no reference to subsequent developments and scholarship. Cheers — Amakuru (talk) 16:09, 5 June 2023 (UTC)