Talk:Buddhist crisis

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on May 30, 2010, May 30, 2013, May 30, 2016, May 30, 2017, May 30, 2019, and May 30, 2023.

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Vietnam Mid‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Vietnam, an attempt to create a comprehensive, neutral, and accurate representation of Vietnam on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.VietnamWikipedia:WikiProject VietnamTemplate:WikiProject VietnamVietnam articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Buddhism Mid‑importance This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects.BuddhismWikipedia:WikiProject BuddhismTemplate:WikiProject BuddhismBuddhism articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

The current title (Buddhist crisis) is very broad and not reflective of actual content. I suggest moving the article to

This article isn't about the coup. It's about the unrest that the preceded it. The coup is already covered in

1963 South Vietnamese coup. Charles Essie (talk) 16:14, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Buddhist crisis's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "j2634":

• From Huế chemical attacks: Jones, pp. 263–264.
• From Đỗ Cao Trí: Jones, pp. 263-64.

Reference named "h136":

• From Nguyễn Ngọc Thơ: Hammer, p. 136
• From Đỗ Cao Trí: Hammer, p. 136.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 15:30, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]