Talk:Cairn

Scotland High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Death Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archaeology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

I have an opinion that one of the first Cairns is referred to in the Bible. Joshua Chapter 6, Joshua had just crossed the river Jordan. Then the LORD commands that 12 stones be carried from the River Bed and piled up as a memorial. So whenever you see a Cairn you may wish to reflect on how the Israelite Tribes must have felt as they crossed the River Jordan into what was referred to as the Land Of Milk & Honey. This crossing is not to be confused with the crossing of the Red Sea which was led by Moses. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Special:Contributions/196.209.105.118 9 January 2006‎ ‎:

Probably not the first cairns ever but an even better example is Gilead whose name is literally "heap/hill of stones" (Gen. 31); I just added a Middle East section and entry. Nissimnanach (talk) 19:25, 10 June 2021 (UTC)Nissimnanach[reply]

Proposed merge with Ovoo

• oppose - Both articles stand perfectly well on their own, without any content overlap. There's no point in forcing several entirely independent traditions under one title, just because they share a common construction material. --Latebird 22:07, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• oppose — For the same reasons as Latebird and Keinstein (below). Ovoo is a lovely little self-contained article about mounds that are currently used as worship sites by the local culture. The coverage of cairn is far broader. In fact, it's possible to see a point where, with two or three times the amount of information, this article should be further subdivided. For example, the suggestion to split "sea cairn" into a new article has some merit, because those are integrated into a system of navigational marks. Alpha Ralpha Boulevard (talk) 04:50, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry couldn't find how to post, there's this also, about cairns and geopathic stress/ ley-lines: http://www.landandspirit.net/html/geopathic_stress.html . Also, there are other possible references in the Bible to more than just Joshua erecting a cairn, for puposes of being an altar or for a memorial. 219.69.19.79 (talk) 13:06, 5 February 2009 (UTC)grego[reply]

Merging with either Inukshuk or Ovoo, good heavens, no!

Excuse me, but the proposition cannot be seriously founded! I am just an ordinary humanist and no authority on cairns and the like, but can see immediately that traditions, contexts and connotations are different altogether, notwithstanding perhaps accidental overlaps (and not more) in function. Or else, bring together all kinds of heaps of stone in one article (sea marks, boundary marks, mounds cleared from fields ... - most of which are also well-known targets of folklore.) I'm not meaning to dogmatically rule out possible historical connections between these three or a common psychocultural basis - but such things, you handle with in-article reasoning from each respective viewpoint and cross-references. Keinstein 02:42, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
What might provide a useful added arena for knowledge, on the other hand, would be a generic article where the broad outlines and general theories can be drawn - just as there are articles on language families while still each major language has its own article, etc. Keinstein 03:00, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Slightly amended Keinstein 13:33, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In the US cairns are used to denote the corners of mining claims, and in times past the documentation was placed in the traditional Prince Albert tobacco can lodged in one cairn. This may be required by the mining claims act of 1872. LorenzoB (talk) 20:00, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In the 1980s, I participated in setting up a first aid cairn on Rawalpindi Lake in Canada's Northwest Territories. It was a cache of supplies to be accessed in case of emergency -- things like a rifle, first aid supplies, dried rations, emergency radio, etc.

Either I'm misremembering what we called the thing when we set it up, or it's an extra meaning for cairn. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 17.202.12.143 (talk) 17:46, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sea cairns are different from other cairns in these ways: They are part of a modern system (of navigation), they are regulated by international convention, they are planned, they are established and maintained, they are subject to damage, they are mapped, there are historical records of their placement. Now I could be wrong about the specifics. But even hiking cairns -- the next closest thing -- in the US are not similar, they are informal, small, irregularly spaced, unmapped. Comments? Thoughts? Alpha Ralpha Boulevard (talk) 09:18, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. The anon editor who added the tag appears to be years gone from Wikipedia, unfortunately. I'm not qualified to write the Sea cairn article, myself. This is one of those frustrating situations where the maritime is woefully under-represented in Wiki...regardless of their availability, there is subject matter here, and a experienced sailor should be writing it. Alpha Ralpha Boulevard (talk) 09:28, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There is very little material. I will remove the split tag until a qualified editor writes an article . It is ok here for the time being. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 03:29, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think we need to differentiate between different types: chambered cairn, kerb cairn, platform cairn, round cairn, and the ring cairn, as we have done on the Welsh Wicipedia. Llywelyn2000 (talk) 11:12, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Though I see the page gives the origin ("from the Scottish Gaelic: càrn"), nothing here indicates what this actually means, other than as the original term for such a pile of stones. Can anyone give a clearer definition of the word? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.187.9.79 (talk) 14:51, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cairn. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070820120212/http://www.radnor.com/department/division.asp?fDD=9-108 to http://www.radnor.com/department/division.asp?fDD=9-108

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:22, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

IMHO, this article should be linked to de:Cairn_(Steinhügel) rather than de:Steinmännchen. I don't know how to do it, can someone please change it? Thanks. --Jochim Schiller (talk) 09:26, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cairn. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120126004546/http://portal.fma.fi/portal/page/portal/589032C37AAC7314E040B40A0A016368 to http://portal.fma.fi/portal/page/portal/589032C37AAC7314E040B40A0A016368

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:21, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Cairns, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Crouch, Swale (talk) 21:07, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]