This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles
This article is part of WikiProject Gender studies. This WikiProject aims to improve the quality of articles dealing with gender studies and to remove systematic gender bias from Wikipedia. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Gender studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Gender studiesTemplate:WikiProject Gender studiesGender studies articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects,
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section
Note: These lists are
transcluded
from the project's tasks pages.
A fact from Cake and Cunnilingus Day appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 1 April 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
WP:CIVIL environment for editors of ALL backgrounds, including white American and western european men, whose voices needed to be heard as well. If I am banned over this, I want you all to know that I love Wikipedia, and I hope that other editors can learn from my mistakes. If I have offended anyone, I'm terribly sorry.Jaredscribe (talk) 23:24, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply
]
To "honour" women?
The introduction states that the purpose of this day is to "honour" women, but nowhere in any information on this is that really made clear as the main purpose for this day. It seems much more to the point to say the day celebrates female sexual desire (even though it's essentially only a joke day anyway) than to broadly (no pun intended) declare that it's a day with simply the generic purpose of "honouring women". This is why I changed the intro. Alialiac (talk) 21:39, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
WP articles have to be neutral in language and balanced in content. The celebration intended for women, which is described in this article, is intended to balance the Steak and Blowjob Day which is intended for men. The word, "honor" indicates balance and common decency. The word is used in the same context as one might use it for family birthdays, e.g. if we honour the birthday of one child with a day out, then we should honour the other childrens' birthdays in the same way. Storye book (talk) 08:25, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Some reviews are pure cringe, do they need to be here?
Such as the one from some Danish site that stated, women are simply great, and therefore cannot be honored and pampered enough." 🤮
The absurd pandering to women oozes out like a slime in this statement, does it really need to be here? Just because something is referenced doesn't mean it's a good one, and even if it's a reputable source that's not the only criterion to go on, it should preferably be intelligent and have an actual point as well. Pathological kowtowing to women is not an intelligent point to make, about this topic or anything else. I recommend removing the citation. Alialiac (talk) 22:00, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
WP articles need to be balanced and neutral. It is not appropriate to exclude the reviews that we don't like, and it is certainly not appropriate to exclude reviews in response to the opinion of one reader. WP articles are not supposed to reflect opinion. Storye book (talk) 08:30, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Alialiac: If you think like the article is unbalanced, feel free to suggest some additional sources that restore balance. It might be hard to find critical reviews since, as you acknowledge, this is mostly a joke thing; but if you manage to find some we could add them. Unless the source used in a reference is unreliable, it is better and easier to restore balance by providing additional, different sources than removing exisiting ones.
You are not completely wrong about the Danish one, although it is German. I happen to be able to read that, and the source actually says something a little different: "Women are simply great – and therefore can't be honored and pampered enough. At least that's what they thought when they invented cake and cunnilingus day." This makes for a more balanced view, although I'm not sure how to adjust that in the article. Feel free to make adjustments to this sentence, and kudos for using the talkpage instead of just starting an edit war or something. This is the way. --LordPeterII (talk) 13:25, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
