Talk:Canon Law Society of America
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
I don't see any bias. The basic info is wholly in accord with the purposes of the Society; it's virtually identical to what is published on the Society's webssite and in its various publications.Pcounce (talk) 12:26, 13 September 2011 (UTC) The original author was tasked to provide a Wikipedia presence for the Society. COI disclaimer: I also am a member of the Society.Pcounce (talk) 12:45, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
- I'm not the original author, and I am not a member of the society. I am, however, knowledgeable of things canonic, and I do not see any bias or tilt in this article. I am removing the Conflict of Interest template. This article does have other issues, however, such as a lack of references to 3rd-party sources, and a general lack of references. I added the applicable template. Canon Law Junkie §§§ Talk 15:31, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Canon Law Society of America. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080220062727/http://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG1104/_INDEX.HTM to http://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG1104/_INDEX.HTM
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
{{source check
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:06, 14 November 2016 (UTC)