User talk:CanonLawJunkie

This user may have left Wikipedia. CanonLawJunkie has not edited Wikipedia since 29 July 2021. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

/Archive

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bigamy (canon law) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bigamy_(canon law) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Veverve (talk) 02:30, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Jurisprudence of canon law has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Veverve (talk) 01:14, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Hello. The article Collectiones canonum Dionysianae would really need some improvements, because most of the paragraphs are not sourced. Since those subjects seem to be down your alley, I allowed myself to message you. Veverve (talk) 20:23, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
By the way,

Hello, CanonLawJunkie. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:02, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Canon Law articles needing attention has been nominated for deletion. Please see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2021 October 18. – Fayenatic London 08:35, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi CanonLawJunkie,

I am Petros Apostolopoulos, a Ph.D. candidate in Public History at North Carolina State University. My Ph.D. project examines how historical knowledge is produced on Wikipedia. If you are interested in participating in my research study by offering your own experience of writing about history on Wikipedia, you can click on this link https://ncsu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9z4wmR1cIp0qBH8. There are minimal risks involved in this research.

If you have any questions, please let me know. Petros Apostolopoulos, [email protected] Apolo1991 (talk) 15:37, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Fundamental theory (canon law) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 2#Fundamental theory (canon law) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 01:44, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Philosophy of canon law and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 2#Philosophy of canon law until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 01:44, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Fundamental theory of canon law and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 2#Fundamental theory of canon law until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 01:44, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Theology of canon law and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 2#Theology of canon law until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 01:44, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Canonical jurisprudence and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 20#Canonical jurisprudence until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 14:38, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Canon law jurisprudence and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 20#Canon law jurisprudence until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 14:38, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Jurisprudence of canon law and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 20#Jurisprudence of canon law until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 14:39, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have improved those two articles. However, they would need to be updatee to be in line with the current Catholic canon law:

• Excommunication in the Catholic Church
• Heresy in the Catholic Church

This kind of job seems right up your alley, so feel free to lend a hand in improving those articles! Veverve (talk) 20:11, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article

reliable source

that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § Category:WikiProject X members on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Qwerfjkltalk 09:33, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]