Talk:Casma–Sechin culture

Archaeology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Indigenous peoples of the Americas Mid‑importance

	Indigenous peoples of the Americas portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the Americas, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Indigenous peoples of the Americas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of the AmericasWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the AmericasTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the AmericasIndigenous peoples of the Americas articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

South America: Peru Low‑importance

	Latin America portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject South America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to South America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject South AmericaTemplate:WikiProject South AmericaSouth America articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Peru (assessed as Mid-importance).

Requested move 17 August 2018

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved to Casma–Sechin culture. There is a consensus to retain both names, but to avoid the slash per naming conventions. (closed by non-admin page mover) Brad v 19:18, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WP:SLASH ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:14, 17 August 2018 (UTC)--Relisting. Dekimasuよ! 03:02, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

Oppose. My problem is that the title Sechin Complex is not inclusive enough to describe the topic. The several archaeological remains of the culture are found not only in the Sechin River valley, but also in the Casma River Valley. The title Sechin Complex might be interpreted as excluding the ruins in the Casma Valley. The title Casma/Sechin culture makes clear that all these ruins were similar in culture, existed contemporaneously, and were possibly politically united for part of their 2,000 year history.

Yes, the name Sechin Complex is often used to describe this grouping of ancient settlements. However, as several of the ruins already bear the Sechin name (Sechin Alto, Sechin Bajo, and Cerro Sechin), I also thought it would be better if the article bore a more encompassing and less confusing name than Sechin Complex.

There is also precedent. The culture found about 100 miles distant is described in the article titled

Norte Chico civilization

. One reason that title was chosen was that it is more inclusive than other possible titles such as Caral or Caral-Supe civilization.

I understand there is a perceived problem with the slash between Casma/Sechin. Fine, change it to a dash.Smallchief (talk) 03:16, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Smallchief: Do you have a better alternative? ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:18, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Casma-Sechin culture. Or Sechin-Casma culture. Smallchief (talk) 03:21, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In that case, we would probably go with an en-dash:
WP:ENDASH. Dekimasuよ! 03:32, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.