Talk:Chang (Star Trek)
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Chang (Star Trek) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
"Original Klingon"
I'm reasonably sure that this line in STVI was meant to be a joke on Chang's part; he's a smart guy and would obviously know that Shakespeare wasn't a Klingon. He was just tweaking the Federation folks and was not (as the article implied before I chagned it) saying that Shakespeare wrote in Klingon. --Jfruh 17:02, 29 July 2005 (UTC)
- In the Klingon Hamlet (I bought it in Vegas, where else?), the preface is supposedly written by other Klingon researchers who make the same claim. The entirety of Star Trek VI is laden with elements from real international affairs. In the instance of Hamlet in Klingon, it is based on German propaganda that implied William Shakespeare was originally German. It only seems more absurd in this context. For a final laugh, the preface the Klingon Hamlet talks about Romeo & Juliet as one of Shakespeare's "Problem Plays" (from the Klingon mindset) while his greatest work, to them, was unsurprisingly Titus Andronicus. --Bobak 19:57, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:General Chang.JPG
Please go to
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 10:05, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
Assessment
I have added a quality assessment rating and importance rating to this article. Feel free to change them as the article improves! Also, feel free to add more issues to the list below, and strike them out (strike) when they're completed. — OranL (talk) 03:52, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
Notable issues
- The article need to cite its sources.
The article needs a picture. (I have asked User:Misza13 to restore the image that was previously used. — OranL (talk) 03:52, 4 August 2008 (UTC))
Notability
Just about all of this "article" looks like a re-hash of the ST:6 plot from Chang's perspective. Maybe some stuff from fansites, novels, comics, an editor's fiction, etc., thrown in (and this is the "Overview" section!). The whole thing ought to be condensed into a couple of sentences and put in ST:6's character section. — Cbbkr (talk) 22:50, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
- THIS. How the hell does this get a article and Christopher Lloyd in ST3 don't get shit?--Razdower (talk) 20:37, 9 April 2015 (UTC)