Talk:Charles Thomson

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

1

According to the publisher's note of the Historical Printing Society edition of Thomas Jefferson's Notes on the State of Virginia (1894), edited by John Leicester Ford[1] , Charles Thomson contributed a 25 page appendix to the original English publication, published by London's John Stockdale in a run of approximately 200 copies.

In 1853 JW Randolph and Company [2] republished the work incorporating various materials from the Estate provided by Jefferson's literary executor Thomas Jefferson Randolph. The new publication corrected some errors to the original Stockdale publication, including a correction, in appendix form, to an error in the original publication which Jefferson made note of in an 1785 missive to Thomson:

"... Pray ask the favor of Colo Monroe in page 5, line 17, to strike out the words 'above the mouth of the Appomattox,' which makes none sense of the passage ..."

The Historical Printing Society publication removes Thomson's notes from appendix and instead offers them in footnote form throughout the work according to the original plates to which they refer. Arijudewalker (talk) 17:11, 1 January 2014 (UTC)arijudewalker[reply]

References

  1. ^ Jefferson, Thomas (1894). Notes on the State of Virginia. Brooklyn, New York: Historical Printing Society. p. 17.
  2. ^ Jefferson, Thomas (1894). Notes on the State of Virginia. Brooklyn, New York: Historical Printing Society. p. 13.

Chachomp's claim that Thomason was misspelled as "Thomson"

This edit by "Chachomp" smells for a number of reasons:
  1. A claim as brash as this craves a citation, but Chachomp does not provide one.
  2. If this were true, I would expect to find some mention of it on the web, yet a Google search on (Charles Thomson Thomason Secretary "Continental Congress") does not find any discussion of the issue.
  3. Such a brazen claim demands a detailed explanation on the Talk page, but Chachomp's only explanation was a brief note in the summary comment.
  4. The claim that "there are many sites that show the correct spelling" is untrue. A Google search on the terms ("Charles Thomason" Secretary "Continental Congress") yields only 41 hits, while a search on ("Charles Thomson" Secretary "Continental Congress") yields 17,500 hits.
  5. He changed all occurrences of "Thomson" to "Thomason", including the name of the image file, thus breaking the link to the image.
  6. It is the only edit ever made by "Chachomp".

As a result, I reverted the edit. -- JPMcGrath 09:19, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

Update

I checked into this further and I am convinced that the correct spelling for the name is indeed "Thomson". And while it does appear that Thomson's name was occasionally misspelled, on such occasions it was usually misspelled "Thompson", not "Thomason".

Fortunately, there are images of many historical documents available on the internet these days. One such collection is the American Memory collection at the Library of Congress.

The vast majority of documents I found were from the Continental Congress and had the printed signature "CHARLES THOMSON, Secretary" at the bottom. Examples of this are:

However, there were a not-insignificant number that had the printed signature "CHARLES THOMPSON, Secretary" at the bottom. In these cases, the main document page notes that the signature is "Charles Thompson [i.e. Thomson]". Examples of this are:

Finally, there are quite a few documents and letters that contain the hand-written signature, presumably written by Charles Thomson himself. In these cases, the spelling is always "Cha Thomson" or "Cha Thomson Secy". For example:

There are many other examples of Thomson's signature available by going to the American Memory collection and entering "Charles Thomson" in the search box. Unfortunately, some of the collections are not very web friendly - there does not seem to be an obvious way of creating a persistent link to the documents.

--- Edit - It is ironic that Charles Thomson signed his name as "Cha", which is part of the user's name that initiated the original edit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.139.70.237 (talk) 09:45, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 16:02, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]